Great Coinworld article

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by nickelman, Jul 5, 2007.

  1. nickelman

    nickelman Coin Hoarder

    Here's a great Coinworld article on the 1994 and 1997 Matte nickels and the dilema they pose for the Jefferson Nickel Collector!

    http://www.coinworld.com/news/071607/BW_0716.asp

    What goes through the minds of those at the mint that run these pograms?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jody526

    jody526 New Member

    Collectors assembling a com-plete collection of Jefferson 5-cent coins from will require two Matte Finish examples that wereonly available in special sets.

    Man. He types worse than I do. LOL
     
  4. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    The managing editor of Coin World must have been out of the office when that article went to press.:whistle:

    Bruce.
     
  5. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    Question is: How many of each do you have?? I have one of each of the sets, as well as a 97-P Matte in my 20th century key date set. The 3-leg that I use for my avatar is also in that set.
     
  6. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    I do not believe that unless you have the matte proof coins then you do not have a complete collection of Jefferson nickels . There are some who only collect Jefferson proofs and some that only collect business strike Jefferson nickels from 1938 to date, so for them that is there complete collection. And there are some that say you need all type I and type II 1938 to date the list can go on and on. I do not have the matte proofs and do not think I need them. Mike congratulation they are very nice examples of what in my opinion is a great series of coins the Jefferson nickel has always been my favorite coin to collect.

    Bruce.
     
  7. jody526

    jody526 New Member

    Each individual collector is free to decide what constitutes a "complete set".
    Allowing a third party to define those parameters for you is, in my opinion, silly.
     
  8. bruce 1947

    bruce 1947 Support Or Troops

    I agree with you 100% Jody.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page