Medieval coin ID: Edward the Somethingth

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Parthicus, Sep 21, 2016.

  1. Parthicus

    Parthicus Well-Known Member

    I have a small silver medieval coin that I've partially identified, but I'd like some help if possible to narrow it down even further. Here's the coin:
    Edward.jpg
    So far, I think that it is a silver penny from England, and issued by either Edward II or Edward III. The reverse reads "Civitas London" (City of London) so I'm pretty confident at least about the country ID ;) But "Edward II or III" covers over 70 years, and I'm hoping that one of y'all might be able to narrow it down a bit. Any help is appreciated.
     
    stevex6, Mikey Zee, chrsmat71 and 3 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    I think you may have an Edward I based on the obverse legend, but I'll admit to ignorance with the new coinage series. Is there a reason you think Edward II or III over Edward I?
     
  4. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    never mind. I thought the inscription EDW R ANGL DNS HYB didn't continue outside EI's reign but it does. I guess the tell is style, which is difficult To discern from how worn the portrait it. I think the odds might still be in favor of EI due to the massive recoinage effort during his reign, but again, I'm not sure what you are seeing which suggests Edward II or III
     
    Parthicus likes this.
  5. Parthicus

    Parthicus Well-Known Member

    To be honest, my attempt at attributing this was so long ago that I've forgotten why I ruled out Edward I. If you think it's likely to be him rather than a later Edward, I will happily defer to your greater knowledge of the series.
     
  6. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    It's a tough series and I'll admit I've never delved into it much. Let me keep looking and I'll see if I can narrow it down. Letter forms help, but that nick on the first 'E' is hampering things a little...
     
  7. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    i have an edward the first!

    [​IMG]
     
    stevex6, Mikey Zee, Andres2 and 4 others like this.
  8. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    The bifoliate crown says it's most likely not Edward I. Only class 10 is bifoliate with Edward I, and all later issues with Edward II and III and everyone else that reigned after them is bifoliate. Edward I is usually trifoliate.

    The OP coin is for sure from London. The lettering makes me think Edward III.
     
    FitzNigel and Parthicus like this.
  9. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    No, you don't. The bifoliate crown along with the cross on the obverse says it's later. Given the backwards "N", the bifoliate crown, the Mayfield hair, I would say Edward III.
     
  10. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    For the record, see the previous 2 crowns posted, then see this crown to see the difference between bifoliate and trifoliate.

    edward i lincoln.jpg
     
  11. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    hu...really? so it's the little prongs on the sides of the crown that matter? i'll be darned.

    thanks for the info!
     
  12. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    Thanks Swish! I certainly did not catch that. Guess I need to bone up on my Edwards...
     
  13. Parthicus

    Parthicus Well-Known Member

    Well, I've been looking through online photos of Edward II and Edward III pennies to see if I could notice any differences. (I've now ruled out Edward I based on the bifoliate crown, which fortunately is easy to see on my specimen. Looks like I was right the first time.) I noticed that on Edward II coins the N is usually the normal shape, while Edward III have either a backwards N or an N that looks like a capital Pi. My coin has the standard N, so maybe it is likely to be Edward II?

    Also, most examples that I found have the king's name as EDWR (unless that's EDW R for Edwardus Rex?), while mine clearly gives it as EDWAR. Any significance to this?

    Also also: This has made me appreciate the skill of medieval coin specialists in reading those tiny, cramped, abbreviated legends with weird letter-forms.
     
  14. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    First off, the "R" you refer to means "REX", which is short Latin for King. "EDW" is Edward, EDWA is Edward, R is Rex. So the Obverse legend reads EDW R or EDWA R. There are some legends that read EDWAR R, but those have not been presented. EDWA R ANGL DNS HYB is a common legend on class 10 (Edward I) pennies, but it goes forward with Edward II and Edward III. They continued it. Most of their pennies had the same legend. You have to look at the lettering to see the difference. Start with the "S". In one reign, it looked one way, in another it looked different. In a third, still different.
     
  15. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    It's more than the little prongs, but, yeah, the little prongs have a lot to do with it.
     
  16. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    chrsmat71 likes this.
  17. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

  18. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    Thanks for the website Doug! I had been considering getting the Galata guide, but have been on a bit of a French kick at the moment... Might grab Duplessy first.
     
  19. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    yeah, i tried to do mine....these are hard. :bucktooth:
     
    FitzNigel likes this.
  20. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    Agreed - I think I lucked out with mine as it has the distinctive pellet at the beginning of the legends, and if I'm understanding my Spink catalogue, this only happened with Edward I
    02-Eng-Edward I-AR-E1d-01.jpg
    England
    Edward I, r. 1272-1307 (1279-1307)
    London Mint, AR New Coinage Penny, 20.79mm x 1.4 grams
    Obv.: ✚ ºEDW R' ANGL DNS HyB
    Rev.: ºCIVI | TAS | LON | DON
    Note: Class 4d
    Ref.: SCBC 1397
     
  21. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    Actually, I disagree. These are easy, when you apply some effort. Romans are hard. But I bet @dougsmit disagrees. It's a matter of perspective.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page