GTG 1885-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by numist, Feb 23, 2024.

  1. numist

    numist Member Supporter

    Here we go again.. IMG_20240223_155152181~2.jpg IMG_20240223_155238453~2.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    MS 62.
     
    numist likes this.
  4. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    I rarely get these right but I'll bite.
    MS 63
     
    numist likes this.
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    60
     
    numist likes this.
  6. Jersey magic man

    Jersey magic man Supporter! Supporter

  7. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Not seeing much wear just bag marks and luster grazes. MS62 maybe a 63.
     
    numist likes this.
  8. ZoidMeister

    ZoidMeister Hamlet Squire of Tomfoolery . . . . .

    63 from me.

    Z
     
    numist likes this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I don’t see any wear but I do see a lot of bag marks so I’m at MS-61.
     
    numist likes this.
  10. Neal

    Neal Well-Known Member

    MS-62
     
    numist likes this.
  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I like it. Those are just luster grazes. I hope they didn't give it lower than 62.
     
    numist likes this.
  12. Dima

    Dima Member

    Thinking MS63.

    Excellent detail and luster (as far as I can tell), just a handful of scrapes and dings presumably from spending years bagged in a vault somewhere.
     
    numist likes this.
  13. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Obv looks 62, Rev looks 64

    MS63
     
    numist and Dima like this.
  14. atcarroll

    atcarroll Well-Known Member

    Lots of chatter in the fields but nice strike for a mid 80s O mint. I like it at 62 but it probably says 63 on the slab.
     
    numist likes this.
  15. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    AU-55
     
    numist likes this.
  16. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    62 or 63, if I gotta choose I'll go 63.
     
    numist likes this.
  17. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

  18. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Sharp looking coin. Appears to have nice luster. I don't see any wear. Nice full strike (which aren't uncommon for 1885-O). But, it is pretty baggy. I think it's a solid MS63.
     
    numist likes this.
  19. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Sorry, I fail to see the “excellent” or “nice” luster other posters noticed. I’d grade it MS63 because there’s only the usual chatter and no severe hits, but not higher.
     
    numist likes this.
  20. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    I'm never right, but I'll say 62. Couple of baggies that keeps it from being higher. I don't see any wear at all.
     
    numist likes this.
  21. numist

    numist Member Supporter

    Barney McRae, Mr.Q, Dima and 3 others like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page