GTG 1916 Barber Dime

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Dima, Feb 7, 2024.

  1. Dima

    Dima Member

    This one is currently on a Fedex truck on its way back to me from PCGS, part of my favorite 20th Century Type Set --

    1916_barber_dime.jpg

    AU65..? MS55..? PL?! What are your thoughts? :)
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2024
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. croesus_amok

    croesus_amok Supporter! Supporter

    It looks right on the border between 58 and 60. I'd probably lean towards AU58.
     
    Coins4Eli and Dima like this.
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    AU65, MS55? Wrong.
    With that said, I'll guess MS62.
     
    dwhiz and Dima like this.
  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    AU55
     
    Dima likes this.
  6. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I can't tell if it's a super-slider (AU58), or a Mint State coin. I just can't tell if there's rub in the hair or not.

    I'm going to go way out on a limb and say MS64.

    Here is an MS64 (CAC) I once had.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Jersey magic man

    Jersey magic man Supporter! Supporter

    MS62. But what do I know about grading.
     
    dwhiz and Dima like this.
  8. Dima

    Dima Member

    I know it; just being bit silly.

    The one key thing I'll add is that the coin has surprisingly full cartwheel luster, despite the relatively dark toning.

    I'm shocked that's only a 64.. and doesn't have a Gold CAC. I wonder if reconsideration/regrade would at the very least append a plus.

    Here are the other two type coins I have:

    cert_13709626_coinfacts_209512225_Max.jpg
    1913 PCGS AU53

    cert_37151662_coinfacts_209512226_Max.jpg
    1913 PCGS MS62

    I love Barber's designs. I feel his dime doesn't get enough love due to size and recycled reverse design.
     
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    You could be forgiven for not knowing- this is a challenging one! I am not terribly confident in my (rather optimistic) assessment, either.
     
  10. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Lack luster (literally) by the photogs. Interesting colour going on. Some folks like toning, but I think it be hidin' something maitey........'55 and an old douche.
     
    Mainebill and Dima like this.
  11. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    62
     
    Dima likes this.
  12. ZoidMeister

    ZoidMeister Hamlet Squire of Tomfoolery . . . . .

    MS63

    Z
     
    Dima likes this.
  13. David Betts

    David Betts Elle Mae Clampett cruising with Dad

    Here to Z 63
     
    Dima and ZoidMeister like this.
  14. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

  15. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  16. numist

    numist Member Supporter

    MS64
     
    Dima likes this.
  17. dimeguy

    dimeguy Dime Enthusiast

    I am at AU 58. I want more detail in the hair, corn kernels and definition to the leaves with greater luster demonstration for the MS grades. That is just me though. Still, very beautiful dime!
     
  18. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I see a bit of corrosion along with the toning. AU-58, nice coin.
     
    Dima and Coins4Eli like this.
  19. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  20. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'm being optimistic and saying MS 64.
    I don't see wear based on the photo (if it was there, it would be a nice AU 58).
     
    Dima likes this.
  21. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    58 my call. No way that coin in my opinion rates ms. I could even see 55 if the luster too muted but can't call from pics
     
    longshot, Pickin and Grinin and Dima like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page