1913 Type 1 Buffalo Nickel GTG

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by jtlee321, Aug 18, 2016.

  1. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Here's another GTG for you @Cascade. It's a 1913 Type 1 Buffalo Nickel. I have not posted this one yet, it's a newp off of eBay.

    1913-Type-1-Buffalo-Nickel-#4-Obverse.jpg 1913-Type-1-Buffalo-Nickel-#4-Reverse.jpg
     
    mas4492 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  4. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  5. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    64/5. A beauty!
     
  6. Coinlover67

    Coinlover67 Well-Known Member

    65

    Sent from my A463BG using Tapatalk
     
  7. coloradobryan

    coloradobryan Well-Known Member

    I'll go with 65. Late die state with somewhat of a weak strike, but still a nice coin. I like the textured fields on the type 1, forget what the technical term for it is though. Nice strong die crack on the reverse too.
     
  8. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    My first thoughts as well.. A little VLDS makes it a tad weaker strike,but the coin is lovely. 65+
     
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    65 Pretty coin.
     
  10. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    What are the spikes to the left of UNUM?
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  12. Dale Lassiter

    Dale Lassiter Active Member

  13. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    you can see the metal flow lines...65
     
  14. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    65...weak strike...looks like arrows in back to left of unum.
     
  15. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  16. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    The spikes to the left of UNUM are classic clashing left by the notch on the Indian's neck and jaw. They are very common. I did not notice the fractured rear leg until after I posted the images. The reverse die is a later die state than the obverse die. Both are late die state though.
     
  17. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    This was a good exercise in confirming whether or not I made a good purchase. I paid AU money for this Buffalo. It's currently housed in a SEGS holder at MS-65. I think I might try to cross it to PCGS.

    1913-Type-1-Buffalo-SEGS-MS65-Slab-front.jpg
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  18. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Nice coin. Compared it to a 66 I have and thought it was very close, if not there.
     
  19. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I personally think it has too many hits and not quite enough luster to get to 66. I'd be very happy with it getting 65.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  20. coinquest1961

    coinquest1961 Well-Known Member

    Contrary to popular belief SEGS often gets it right. I don't slab with Larry anymore but that was my experience in the past and I agree with the assigned grade.
     
  21. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I did some homework on SEGS before I set my snipe bid on this Buffalo. I had read that they are pretty good on grading some of the classic coinage. Typically if they are off it's only by about 1 point or so. So I figured at worst I would get a MS-64 Buffalo. I was pleasantly surprised to have won it for just a hair under $30.00.
     
    fish4uinmd and Santinidollar like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page