GTG 1902 Morgan

Have fun! Yeah, I know. I'm a coin collector, not a photographer...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Ms64. I think too many marks on the face to make 65

 

Ms 64

Sent from my A463BG using Tapatalk

 

64

 

TPG grade 64 , my grade 63 .

 

Ok this one is Definatly ms lol. If not, I'm selling all my coins and moving to Alaska to start panning for gold.

Today it could go 63 but in vintage ngc I'll say it has 64 on the label. I'm a little gunshy now with your pics though santini lol. Odd that the strike is moderately weak around the ear but the reverse looks almost full. A tale of 2 sides to say the least. I like it

 

Though on further review it looks relatively clean for a Morgan and has blazing luster , though I doubt it's an 1892 , lol more like a 1902 . A 64 seems right .

 

I'm at 63 on this one, looks like a nice strike nice luster,but again your photo skills are hard to interpret on this pad. Wouldn't be surprised if it did go 64.

 

64

 

Sorry gang! It is a 1902!!!!!!!!!!! Title corrected

 

I say NGC gave it a 64.

Chris

 

I'll jump out of a tree and say NGC gave it a
MS65
Great luster for a late P mint Morgan

 

Possible. I've seen weak strikes at 65 in old holders. I guess they were a little more lienent on them in years past and this one isn't that weak aside the ear

 

63

 

No reason you can't be both.

I'll guess 64, but wouldn't buy it as such without seeing it in hand, since the prime focal areas of the obverse are hidden in the picture. It is quite flashy for a 1902.

 

63

 

Sort of hard to do with two hands full of beignet's!
Better be careful PCGS has a Sugar sniffer, don't want to get details "confectioners sugar".

 

Well blame your misses on my lousy photography. Here you go.

 

So..... By default, I WIN
(Takes bow) pulls out Cuban cigar

 

Well I screwed this up any way. Posted the wrong reverse. Duhhhhh