Ancient coins with a sand Honest answer (quoting Doug @GDJMSP ) there is nothing wrong with "cleaning" but not "Harsh cleaning". In general any wiping on modern coins will leave hairlines that most find objectionable.
Ancient coins with a sand patina should be evaluated to see 1) is there enough left of the design and legends to identify it and 2) would it benefit from some gentle brushing/soaking to reveal more details. Just be careful, cleaning can never be reversed (legitimately)
I like the way the details stand out on OP’s coin. If you take all the sandy look away it just might distract the details. Do I make sense?
Legitimate sand/desert patinas should be left alone. You will find dealers that apply paint or glue to create a "sand patina". It has already been mentioned that the patina is probably hiding fitted fields. The question I have is this. Is it ethical for dealers to apply a patina without disclosing it? You can find coins from dealers that will say repatinated.
Great question. Cleaning coins removes the natural luster of the metal. If you take a silver dollar and slowly move it parallel to a light source, you'll see a kind of cartwheel effect rotate as you turn. This is severely diminished or even eliminated when the coin is cleaned. https://www.google.com/search?sca_e...ate=ive&vld=cid:8258bcbb,vid:jJf9GMDmRKM,st:0
Yes, he asked for advice about an ancient coin and you were talking about modern coins. Wrong board...and I see you just followed up talking about a silver dollar. What we have here is a failure to communicate.
Personally I have never seen the attraction of a coin obscured by a layer of clay. But anyway, if desired the clay can be removed by soaking in a weak acid like vinegar, plus a bit of rubbing and scraping with plastic needles or similar. However underlying a desert patina you will (normally) find a hard black oxidised surface, which really isn't much more attractive, so I simply don't collect such coins in the first place. Nemo