Washington Quarter Type B Reverse

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Rheingold, Aug 9, 2016.

  1. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Do you agree with me that this reverse of a 1957 Washington is a type B one?
    IMG_20160809_154749.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. MKent

    MKent Well-Known Member

    I concur
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  4. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    And seconded. However 57 is a very common b1 year I believe
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  5. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    It doesn't matter, I'm just happy to have one.
     
    Cascade likes this.
  6. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Your thread sparked my interest. I think I found a 59 in my Washington book. It looks like it's in pretty good condition with a couple of die cracks. Thanks for posting!
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  7. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Nice! Looks like a type B to me.

    Did you get it out of a junk bin for melt value? Bin trolling pays off so much.

    Once I got a 1966 Australia 10 cents in MS-65/66 and an 1890 British halfpenny in VF (slight PVC residue, will come off with acetone). Both for 39 US cents. (50 Canadian cents, I was in a Canadian coin shop)

    Another time I got a 1932 Swiss 5 rappen for 25 cents in a junk bin. I'd say it grades out at MS-63.

    Not to mention my Liberty Head Nickels - 1888 and 3x 1896, 50 cents each. All heavily worn, but still worth a nice premium over the price I bought them at.
     
  8. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    @Omegaraptor

    I got it from a put together type coin set from eBay Germany.
     
  9. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Question for each of you. At what grade level do you think the OP's coin would start to become significant? 65?
     
  10. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Would you show us some pics?
     
  11. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

  12. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    I'm not sure what this would straight grade. I thought I read somewhere, if it doesn't grade 65+ it's a waste of time. This guy unfortunately has two nice hits, one in the left field of the Obv. and one on his cheek. Plus some die cracks. Sorry about the lighting, it sucks! Enjoy..

    S20160809_001.jpg S20160809_002.jpg S20160809_003.jpg S20160809_004.jpg S20160809_005.jpg S20160809_006.jpg S20160809_009.jpg S20160809_010.jpg
     
  13. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Hmmm, I just noticed another die crack after I posted it. Left side on the oak leafs.
     
  14. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    @TJ1952

    Are you sure this isn't the regular Proof version?
    By the way a nice example.
     
  15. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    No, I'm not sure.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page