I THINK I HAVE SOMEThing semi-big right here possible 1992 CAM/DDDR

So there appears to be a few things about this coin that has caught my attention DDO/DDR and id list them as what error I think they are.
1)So the date double struck/struck through grease or something
2)On the date its missing what i believe is an 2 because are certain angles it looks like very light imprint of an 2 you can see the curve of the upper 2 barely
3)I think the date is struck twice it seems to have another 9 just above the 9 in *1992
Liberty Is Partly There: NO L and I possibily Y gone,i/thinkcant remember at time of posting/writing this , but the B E R T are There
Now the BAck
4)CLear doubling IN united and Cents on the Reverse and i think FG has been double struck as well
5) AM is CLose so i think its an 92cam But Not 100 percent sure due the partial date..... I would love to know what you guys Can find with the pictures so i could possible compair notes so to speak.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

more coming Pictures of double FG and doubling on the pillars and is ABe Missing

 

Oh Danny.. you have so much to learn.

First of all and the most important thing to know is that any doubled die has NOTHING at all to do with the coin being struck twice. So you need to stop thinking that numbers are letters look like they were struck twice

The pillars are not doubled. They are supposed to look that way. All pillars have the same appearance.

The die deterioration causes doubling on the number 9 but it is worthless doubling. Not doubled die.

You Cent is not a DDO nor DDR

Doubled Die falls under the Variety category not the Mint Error category. There is a difference.

You haven't posted a picture of the word AMERICA in order to determine if it is Close AM or not.

Your Cent is a result of a worn die strike.
It's considered die deterioration. When the die is wiped with oils during the minting process they become compacted into the incused areas and harden. That will not allow the numbers and letters to form properly on the planchet being struck. So struck through grease on the date is correct.

 

Agree with everything Paddy said.

 

here is the back of it and I see doubling in United and Cent on the back

 

Upload pics of the back

 

THe reverse looks like its doubled and not Machine doubling though i could be wrong\

 

Paddyman98 is the real deal! Listen and learn, you will greatly appreciate his knowledge. He has taught me a bunch. Best of luck with your searches .

 

yes.. you are wrong.

That's not a doubled die variety.

 

The back of a coin is called the Reverse side.

At least you are correct on it being a Close AM. But I really can't tell if the date is actually 1992.

 

AND IF YOU LOOK on the back where AMerica is you can see either an T Next to the A on the Reverse in america and the M is doubled be it either machine doubled or not its

 

I DID!!!!.. it's not a doubled die variety.
That's not a T.. probably a small gass bubble.
Pareidolia.

No more pictures are needed.

 

i do appreciate all the info im not being a smart ass, this is just how i talk and its gets me in trouble sometime and OF course i WILL AMBER,Cant grow my knowledge if im incorrect!

 

SO could it be a 1992 or No way to tell unless sending it in

 

Please look at the information on this picture carefully..

 

Send it in where?

No

You will be wasting your time and money.

 

ok thank you again fot\r all this info

 

I have been collecting for more than 75 years and it seems that I learn something new everyday listening to the experience of the CT members. I agree with everything @paddyman98 said here. The most valuable thought here is to learn the difference between "error" and "variety". The real challenge to collecting is searching for the coin that does not have manufacturing defects.

 

Love it.

 

That sir is caused by a worn die. Not a mint error and not a true doubled die.