Should it be gtg'd with or without the harsh enhancement attempts and damage and green stuff, or with it?
I'll be an outlier on this one and say XF-45, no bean. It might have gone AU-50 on a good day without the dings, hits, and as @charley says, "the green stuff".
very early today, but you all very close/right on... yes she got hit for "cleaned" but I decided I'd rather this nice AU cleaned over any of the VF-XF examples I've found in the same price range she is much darker then then glamor shots show, but it is without a doubt the same coin (the dings match up lol) These were the crappy sellers pics...
The "glamor shot" gives it a totally different look. The slab photo makes it look like it's been artificially recolored. I owned this one for a number of years until I upgraded to a Proof 67. This is the overdate variety although that does not add much to the value.
Interesting, I'd have gone for UNC Details, because the fins on the reverse C rarely last with ANY wear.