Let it be... 1958 DDO

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by CLr, Jul 12, 2016.

  1. CLr

    CLr New Member

    All i can say is let it be the one!! Can I get some more advice from fellow hunters?Is it the 1958 DD0? Thanks.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CLr

    CLr New Member

    Sorry fellow hunters! New here ..Trying to download a pic of my 1958 ddo. Not enough space?
     
  4. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    Well we need pictures. There are only TWO confirmed 1958 DD obverse.
     
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

  6. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    very very unlikely but one never knows. There are in fact two known and a third one is suspected. All from the same original owner. Sound suspicious?
     
    Jdiablo30 likes this.
  7. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    From what I can see up to this point it doesn't look like you don't have it.
     
    19Lyds and tomfiggy like this.
  8. IndianaPenny

    IndianaPenny New Member

    If you had a 1958 DD you wouldn't have to ask if it's the one or not. It's pretty obvious.
     
  9. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

  10. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

  11. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    Is that so? I've known of a few examples being known,but not owned by the same person,kind of makes ya wonder now if he had a connect on the inside of the mint in the late 50s
     
  12. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    It would not surprise me that 1 owner has both since these coins are produced in lots and where there's 1, there a 90% Probability that there is another.

    Had the erroneous die been found and the lots produced by that die been destroyed then it still would not surprise me that both were found concurrently.
     
  13. robec

    robec Junior Member

    I know Pete Miller (ESM) owns at least one. I thought Stewart Blay also owned one.
    These two people may not have been the original owners. Post #5 doesn't say both coins are now owned by one person, only that the original owner did.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page