More machine and Die Deterioration Doubling. What happened to the other side of that coin? I know it's a Pain in the butt, but can you show at least just the 1958? It just makes it simpler to assess the coins. Thanks!
The blank with a part of a date on one side and a indent but blank it’s reverse is perfect and I had 1 comment that it was buffed or sanded not a error I have to disagree because it’s weight is correct providing it is 82 or newer
Try taking Pics like this? Just zoom in a little more and don't forget to crop using either PhotoScape or LunaPic ( Both free!). Thanks!
What was the weight? What does providing that it is 82 or newer mean? That makes no sense. The other side of your Cent have an Upraised rim. And the altered side does not have the upraised rim. So that shows it can't be an unstruck side. Show a picture of the edge.
Here are a few more pictures of the 1958 and I can see the notches clearly on the 1 and a bit on the 9 also the b
It may look similar to coins others have said are DD, but most are wrong as decades ago the different "experts" were trying to claim as many as they could to give them their name and number, but not all were. The most important photo you have is #1803. It shows that the die slowly spread in diameter through use. What is called die deterioration so the L in Liberty is smack up to the rim is an important indicator of die deterioration and is not a true doubled die, it is a shift in the die over time. If it was a true doubled die, each of the image would be the same height . This is probably the most common mistake new collectors make. Do not trust the images on EBAY that looks like your , but claimed to be an expensive coin. Jim
