I think two of the four you're thinking of are equivalent, but the way the press works, one of them is not technically possible.
Well, I voted for weak strike, out of tolerance planchet and low pressure strike. I am leaning toward out of tolerance planchet, though, because the unstruck area of the breast bears what I interpret to be planchet marks that were not obliterated because of the lack of metal fill.
I'm going with strike through because the best feathers seems to have been struck well. The planchet seems fine from that image, and if it was a low pressure strike I believe that the center wouldn't be as well struck.
I haven't even voted yet. I plan on waiting. You are right @messydesk one of them would show at the perimeter of the coin, not in the center.
Answers PLURAL! Strike Through. No. OPSI (original planchet surface impact}marks present on the surface inside the low area Capped Die. No. Nothing in the image suggests this. Post Mint Damage. No. Totally original undamaged surface. Planchet Flaw. No. No evidence of planchet metal filling a defect. All good answers: Weak strike; Out of tolerance planchet; Low Pressure strike. What would cause a low pressure strike?
Insufficient contact between the dies and the planchet caused by either Thin planchet Improper die spacing Improper annealing of planchets before striking, which would require a higher than normal striking pressure Incorrect setting of the pressure adjustment wedge within the press before production Is the subject coin a 1940-S? Those seem to be the pancakes of the entire type.