Braided Hair Large Cent Question

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by skyhawk21, Jul 4, 2016.

  1. skyhawk21

    skyhawk21 Member

    I am thinking about picking this one up, but I have a few questions.

    Does this look whizzed, cleaned, or artificially toned? Does anyone see any problems with it?

    I have been looking over photos of whizzed coins, and I don't think it has been. The color is what has me thrown off. Just wanted some opinions on it. Also, I would be interested to hear what you would grade the coin as.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 4, 2016
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. noname

    noname Well-Known Member

    Yeah looks cleaned and retoned
     
  4. jester3681

    jester3681 Exonumia Enthusiast

    Agreed. Color is way off. Grade AU+/- Details.
     
  5. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Correct for overexposure first, then think about the coin. I'll have a go at it this afternoon when I'm home from work.
     
  6. skyhawk21

    skyhawk21 Member

    What program do you use to do that?
     
  7. skyhawk21

    skyhawk21 Member

    Thanks for the replies, it just seemed a little off. I'm going to pass on it.
     
  8. beef1020

    beef1020 Junior Member

    Interesting coin, it's an N14 in die state c, with the nice rim cud around star 12. It's an intermediate die state coin, the cud eventually extends up to star 12. For a die state collector it's a great coin, but I agree it's been cleaned and has not retoned naturally.
     
  9. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Agree with beef, the color is unnatural, but it is still quite a nice coin. I'd be on it at the right price.
     
  10. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    I use the Gimp. It's not for beginners, but it's pretty powerful. All I did for the following was reduce Levels by 50%:

    1853obv.jpg

    1853rev.jpg

    That's the equivalent of just allowing less light to hit the camera sensor, the same as a faster exposure or narrower aperture or lower ISO. The color still looks off to me as well, but we've no idea what in-camera processing might have happened, especially if the camera thought the shot was washed-out and increased the color saturation to compensate. In-camera JPG processing is not necessarily designed to be "faithful," it's designed to create pleasing images for the customer, and oversaturation is the norm especially in less-expensive models.

    We don't know anything about these shots other than they're large and well-focused. No EXIF data exists, no hint as to what processing happened either in the camera or afterward. If we assume the shooter left the camera to make choices about color, and the camera oversaturated the colors, this is what it might look like - all I did for this was "dial down" the saturation equally for all hues:

    1853obvdesaturated.jpg

    1853revdesaturated.jpg

    We have no way of knowing which of these three sets of images - if any of them - bear any faithfulness to the in-hand look of the coin. Part and parcel of learning to evaluate coins from images is to learn to evaluate images.
     
    Kirkuleez likes this.
  11. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Glad you passed. :happy: This puppy has been buffed, not quite to the point of whizzing. Oh, that's just an opinion.:cigar:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page