Do you think these iron coins are cleaned?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Hiddendragon, Jun 8, 2023.

  1. Hiddendragon

    Hiddendragon World coin collector

    These war era iron German coins usually look pretty bad. Normally very dark, rusty, poor details. But these two I picked up are very shiny with good details, especially on the 1919. The group of coins I bought them from had a lot of cleaned coins in it, but they weren't all cleaned either. So I'm wondering if you think these two are cleaned, the 1916 and 1919. I'm including a separate 1917 for comparison. I'm not sure how they'd be cleaned if they were though. 1916 a germany 10 pfennig06.jpg 1919 germany 10 pfennig06.jpg 1927 germany 10 pfennig121.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Collecting for 49 years Moderator

    I don't know for sure. Like you, I don't know how they would've been cleaned if they were. Perhaps they weren't, and they just didn't turn as dark as the third coin (and most others) normally did.
     
    Cheech9712 and Hiddendragon like this.
  4. PlanoSteve

    PlanoSteve Well-Known Member

    I sometimes use iron castings in my woodworking projects. I get them from several bulk dealers & they usually have been sitting around for awhile & have accumulated dirt, oil & rust. I clean them with naval jelly & they turn out spanking clean, but they always have a patina that looks exactly like those coins. So, maybe...
     
  5. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    They do look cleaned to me, simply based on age, wear, and lack of any evidence of corrosion or circulation gunk.
     
    Hiddendragon likes this.
  6. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Lucky they weren't turned into washers during the great war....
     
  7. robp

    robp Well-Known Member

    Just because they look abnormally good doesn't mean they must be cleaned. There will always be some that were set aside and fortuitously escaped oxidation damage. The 1916 for example has a couple of oxidation(?) marks to both sides - on the 1 o
    and at 3 o'clock.

    Attached is an iron pattern from 1911 which is brilliant and hasn't been cleaned. Sure a pattern is almost ensured careful treatment unlike a circulating coin, but it has still lived in the same atmosphere for over 100 years, yet shows no corrosion.
    upload_2023-6-9_0-53-26.jpeg
     
  8. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    The surfaces on the center coin do not look original. I didn’t explain well, but it’s not because it looks “abnormally good” but because it looks abnormal.
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Collecting for 49 years Moderator

    Wow, that’s an awesome pattern, and a good example of how some iron coins could survive white and bright over a century.
     
  10. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    If so, than market acceptable.
    Nice coins by the way;)
     
    Cheech9712 and lordmarcovan like this.
  11. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    They look fine to me, the way a coin is
    stored goes along way when it comes
    to condition :)
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  12. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Guessing not cleaned
     
  13. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Like the reverse harp
     
  14. TheGame

    TheGame Well-Known Member

    I think both are cleaned. The first coin is zinc-clad iron and the second is zinc. Neither should be that gray at that level of circulation and age. The third coin looks good.
     
    Seattlite86 and Hiddendragon like this.
  15. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Agreed. Thanks for articulating it better.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page