1951 Franklin Half NGC MS-64 Light Golden toning Looks close to FBL in the older holder. Could not get a good close up of bell lines. Snagged off eBay for $20.50 Cheaper than having a raw one sent in & graded.
I just found a post on NGC Collectors Society about Full Bell Lines http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2426204
MS65 Gem Uncirculated are affordable but Proofs and too high IMO. If you don't mind collecting MS63 they are very affordable and many have mintage below 5 million.
I would disagree with your statement regarding proofs being too high. Yes, if you want a top of the line proof, say a PR68DCAM, you are going to pay some scratch, even for a common date in that condition. For example, according to PCGS Price Guide, a 1963 in PR68DCAM is $675. However, you can get PR65CAM Franklins from 1956 to 1963 (except 1959) for $35 - $85. A properly chosen PR65CAM can be QUITE a good looking coin IMO. Clearly, the earlier proofs, 1950 up to say 1953, are much more expensive, but they are also much rarer. I reached the price - performance boundary of Franklin proofs years ago. Here is a link to my Registry set, which was essentially complete over a decade ago (with the earlier dates completed over two decades ago): http://coins.www.collectors-society.com/registry/coins/SetGallery.aspx?PeopleSetID=8601 While I do enjoy CAM/DCAM proofs, I find business strike Franklins much more rewarding. I would agree with your statements with regards to business strike coins. They are quite affordable in MS63, say $15 - $30, and reasonably affordable in MS65. According to PCGS's price guide, a Franklin "Type" MS65 without FBL is $40 and with FBL is $80, although IMO a person should be able to find a raw one for a fair amount less. Here's one of my favorite raw price performance pickups... I'd grade it MS66FBL. It cost me $11.
If you left your set of Franklins to your grandchild and he held it for about 40 years is bet it would really be a good deal. I am not making fun. It takes years for some of these not-so-popular coins to catch the public's fancy and then they are worth big money. Everyone loves Morgans these days but I wonder how popular they were in 1900? I know we have a member here whose father left his an almost complete Morgan-CC set in Unc. condition. Now that is a gift that keeps on giving. I know the 2.5 dollar Indian Head gold piece was unpopular when it was first minted but now they are much sought after as are the $5, $10 and $20 gold pieces.
As I mentioned, I do NOT believe the upper level proof Franklins are a good deal. I was simply making the point that PR65CAM's for the latter dates are reasonably inexpensive. With regards to my set specifically, I bought them for their looks at the price boundary where I still could see some value of upgrading from one technical grade to another. I know I'll lose some money on my set when I eventually sell it, however I've had roughly 25 years to enjoy the set (and the good Lord willing, years to come).
Yes, it is a great set you have there. I like Franklins as well and have a set that are mostly AU to MS63. I don't think they will appreciate much in my life time, but I like them just the same. I have a set of LWH dollars and if I could afford to get them all in MS condition maybe I would do and maybe I wouldn't. I am not in it for the money because I don't have the time or money to buy coins that would really appreciate. I agree with your points about the PR65CAM's.