Fun peeling lamination.

Found this one in an old roll.
I wish I was able to get the paper under the second one on the reverse N, it's not quite loose enough.



How many laminations do you see?
And if these were lost from the coin what type of error do you have?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

detached lamination

 

I see two laminations, the ones on the reverse you mentioned, along with a subtle, small one at the center of the coin, between Lincoln's jawline and coat.

 

Foreign coin impurities So neat looking. I see two for sure. I think lol

 

Doing my best to learn something about the error side of our hobby.... I say two on the reverse and one obverse at Lincoln's neck.

 

What you have there @Pickin and Grinin is a classic example of Lamination Doubling. Lol, laminations are everywhere on the at coin.

 

1940 attached and detached laminations..
from my collection

 

Double like for this answer. I would call the two laminations on the reverse, these look more like they were struck into the coin, therefore what would this coin be called if they were gone?
The lamination on the obverse is just a crack.
The rough surface in between the two on the reverse is just peeling or already peeled.

 

Great looking coin @paddyman98

 

Would incomplete make sense? I’m reading but wow so many. Very nice find as well.

 

Pam I probably asked it wrong and this I am sure would be open for debate. And I would expect to be corrected.
If these are pieces of foreign material that were struck into the coin. Think debri, chunks of finned rim or laminations that were loosened running thru the hopper and attached themselves to a different planchet, then they would be called a..............?

 

Planchet error … lol!

 

They would be called a struck thru I believe.
For example this coin below does not show any type of peeling at the edge of the surfaces.
I would call this a strike thru rather than a loss of lamination.

 

But it’s really called a hop sk

It all sounds the same when reading lol. In my terms, hop, skip and jump! Ooops sorry could not resist. It is cool looking.

 

Correct. Struck Through foreign material. Meaning not part of the original planchet. But it could be a piece that came off another planchet made of the same material.

 

The first photo looks to me like a strike thru.

 

I added a couple photos above.

 

@Pickin and Grinin
I have a similar looking Struck Through

 

Just for clarification, I think this is an attached lamination as the piece of metal is still there. A detached lamination, the metal would be gone. Just my observation.

 

Yes, correct. At the bottom of Pickin and Grinins post he asks

"And if these were lost from the coin what type of error do you have?"