what kind of doubling is this ?

my husband and i are in a debate about the different types of "Doubling" . So can we have somebody please tell us what kind of error coin this is if any.
Thank You
Cynde wife of Don


p.s.
same coin just different light angles ,hope they help

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

It would help if you told us where you think you see doubling.

 

' WE ' and ' G ' ( GOD )

 

I see no doubling. I only see damage from hits.

 

do these highlighted ones help

 

Here is a pic of a real doubled die.
Can you tell the difference? If not you need to study up.

 

Agreed, damage, but enlarging, it looks like a "Woodie". Or an I imagining this guys?

 

I see what looks to be MD on the T in Liberty .

 

I'm not seeing a woodie Tom , if it is it's very minor .

 

I see machine doubling on that one tomfiggy, just send that one my way

 

nope, but imagination is a good thing lol.

 

'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
-

Einstein-
This IS 'studying up.'
Here's a 95 that's doubled but not easy to see via `E PLURIBUS UNUM `

 

I'm not seeing it. I see a hit on the top of the W and lower E. Not seeing a woodie either.

 

Here are the listings for 1977 at Wexler's site. He only has ddr's but no DDO's for that year.

http://doubleddie.com/824007.html

http://doubleddie.com/823986.html

Coppercoins.com doesn't list anything but one MM error for that year.

 

Jim in the very 1st picture , is that MD on the T in Liberty , or is it the lighting ?

 

I think its just another hit on the coin.. download it and blow it up. The coin has been ran through the mill so to speak. all along the motto has had something run across it, the area in front of the ear up into the temple area has several scrapes, hits, whatever. The coin has seen better days.

 

Yes the coin has seen better days, and just because there is no historical references on a subject does rule out a "first."
Cynde Don's wife

 

I fixed it for you.

Every DD, RPM and variety listed anywhere was unknown before the first one was found.

 

It does kind of look like machine doubling but that may be because we're all looking at a photo and not in-hand. If you do believe it's the real-deal, you can send it to James Wiles for attribution. It's fairly inexpensive ($8, I believe) and if it's indeed the real deal, you'll get named named as the "discoverer".

 

It is minor and only on the obverse but my eyes could be deceiving me.