What do you grade this Seated Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Apr 20, 2016.

  1. mac266

    mac266 Well-Known Member

    I'm going with AU Details - Cleaned or Dipped.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I see no high point wear. However, it is impossible to judge luster from photos, in general. If it hasn't been dipped to death (DTD) then it may be 58 to lower MS. If DTD, all bets are off.
     
  4. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Pictures are overexposed, but I think she'd get an AU-55 at best.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. anderspud

    anderspud Active Member

    Yes, the coin seems overexposed and washed out. The date on the obverse has better contrast, but it also shows more light coming from 12 o'clock. Less direct light could help.
     
  6. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

  7. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

  8. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    In hand.

    Original not cleaned.
    Will loupe it sometime this weekend when I get a free minute.
    image.jpeg image.jpeg image.jpeg
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  9. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Better in hand. Surfaces still rather lifeless especially the obverse. And not beautiful toning my call au 53 they could knock it to 50 due to the lack of luster tho
     
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I have to agree with Doug on this one. I thought the surfaces funky looking, but if one thinks about it, the coin probably had the chocolate toning typical of seated coinage, and someone didn't like it. It has that crusty, dull, flat, overdipped look, and I would agree on AU Details.
     
  11. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    Luster is actually pretty strong on the obverse. Hard to show it in pictures. Maybe it'll look better when I get some real pictures of it.
     
  12. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Looks a little crusty. Slightly negative eye appeal, probably worth 1/2 grade deduction from whatever the technical grade is. I do wonder if it had a dip at some point in its life. I'd still give it a bath, in case some of that crustiness is actually crud. I wonder if it's just not very photogenic.
     
  13. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Terrific details, but the differing colors of the toning (especially on the reverse) hint at a coin recovering from a dip. The first dip removed most of the black - creating the abrupt transitions between black and "clean" fields, and the spots - and the brownish color arrived after the dip.

    With luck, I'm wrong. I'd be introducing the coin to acetone just to see what happens. It won't affect actual toning.
     
  14. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'll give it a bath before I photograph it and see what happens.
     
  15. Dancing Fire

    Dancing Fire Junior Member

  16. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm at AU-53 or AU cleaned. I may change my opinion with the next images.
     
  17. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    Leaning more towards upper AU now
     
  18. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    The consensus seems to be mid grade AU, but the question is whether or not it grades, due to the seemingly heavy dipping that it got. I say details, some others say it grades. It seems like an overdip to me.
     
  19. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    A U Details
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page