Seeing it in a different light

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by ancientnut, Mar 7, 2016.

  1. 4to2centBC

    4to2centBC Well-Known Member

    I was thinking Tkalec
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    ^ yep, 10.2003 for 16K CHF

    Diffraction up the roof...
    [​IMG]
     
    stevex6 and Bing like this.
  4. anderspud

    anderspud Active Member

    The first looks a little under exposed and has a different toning. The second could use better white balance and shows light coming from the top. The third shows good balanced light source.
     
  5. anderspud

    anderspud Active Member

    The first looks a little under exposed. The second could have better white balance and obviously had the light source from the top. The third has very even distribution of light and shows an attractive patina.
     
  6. ancientnut

    ancientnut Well-Known Member

  7. 4to2centBC

    4to2centBC Well-Known Member

    In retrospect, I realize how sad it is that I can recognize a dealer by the color and style of their photo.
     
    Ancientnoob and ancientnut like this.
  8. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    Man, that's sad! :p
     
  9. ancientnut

    ancientnut Well-Known Member

    An even more striking example:
    The same type as the OP, but with a different obverse die.

    Photo for NAC 33, April 6, 2006, lot 95:

    [​IMG]

    Photo for Stack's, January 14, 2008, lot 2116:

    [​IMG]
     
    Bing likes this.
  10. ancientnut

    ancientnut Well-Known Member

    I'm reviving this thread to show the following coin:

    [​IMG]

    which I was seriously considering until I found this earlier photo:

    [​IMG]
     
    Mikey Zee, 4to2centBC and Ancientnoob like this.
  11. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    That's a hugh difference.
     
  12. Theodosius

    Theodosius Fine Style Seeker

    Was the coin itself re-toned or more toned, or is that all photo difference?

    The abrasion on the cheek is a turn off, but I doubt I would throw her out of my coin tray for eating olives and spitting the pits on the floor.
     
    ancientnut and stevex6 like this.
  13. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    You shouldn't think she's ugly jus' 'cuz she had Acne as a teenager.
     
  14. AncientJoe

    AncientJoe Well-Known Member

    This coin has "been around the block" in the last few years. In addition to these two images, here are two other appearances. This is a useful exercise to prove the value of lotviewing!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    It is a big difference and one that might affect my bidding/purchase decisions....but that would mainly depend upon the cost and the 'discount' one would assume those unfortunate surface conditions would naturally result in. Many of mine are 'flawed' to fit my budget, especially for those a bit pricey or simply rare examples that I crave.

    'Lot viewing' is great advice!!! I can't help but wonder how 'different' it may look in hand.
     
    TIF likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page