Poll: Fake or Real? 1872 IHC

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by heavycam.monstervam, Mar 20, 2016.

?

Fake or Real??

  1. Fake

    16 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Real

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    Thought I'd have another set of eyes look at this, not my coin.... Feather detail extremely mushy, broken O of one reverse
    Guy claims he bought it 3 years ago. IMAG0947.jpg IMAG0948.jpg IMAG0944.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2016
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

  4. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    The 2 is so far off from a real one it's not even close. Plus the date on the 72s was small.
     
    heavycam.monstervam and Paddy54 like this.
  5. gibsport

    gibsport Active Member

    The date definitely looks bad. I know for sure it is fake though due to the position of the last feather in the headband. Pre 1886 the feather should have pointed between the I and C, not the C and A.
     
  6. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    Thx guys, I'm always willing to get educated on a coin... Now I can pass the info on to this guy. Although I feel really bad, I wonder if he will confront the dealer that sold him this thing.3 years have since passed so, it ain't looking good.....
    He says $250 is what he paid:banghead:
     
  7. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    That stinks, but a $250 lesson is still pretty cheap in the scheme of things. I had to pay more than twice that for parking my car in the wrong spot before.

    Based on the price, I would guess the dealer knew it was fake. I would have seriously questioned the price as well, because when you're getting something for significantly below market value, something is generally off.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  8. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    There's the most obvious tell. The spacing is all off in the date, too.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  9. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Yeah the date is way out of line. The digits are closer on a real 72. A good fake to the untrained eye.
     
    heavycam.monstervam and Paul M. like this.
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

  11. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Look for the C mint mark.

    Made in China
     
    Jwt708, mac266 and Paul M. like this.
  12. noname

    noname Well-Known Member

    the 2 doesn't look right, I say fake!
     
  13. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Yes the date is wrong but the first thing that screams fake is the Obv hub of 1886
     
  14. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Totally bogus
     
  15. coinzip

    coinzip Well-Known Member

    Run Forest..... RUN
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page