Grade my coin?

If the pics are good enough, would you give a grade estimate? Thanks.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

65

 

I mean, FAKE

 

No wait, PMD. (OK, I'll stop).

 

I agree.

 

Looks to me like there is something on the holder on the Obverse over the cheek . Can you get a photo of the reverse without so much glare?

 

Lots of luster on the coin. I'll try to get better pics soon.

 

And I know there isn't any toning on it BUT if there was it would totally be Artificial!!!!!

 

65 or 66 on a good day.

 

Based on these photos at least 65.

 

I think you're claiming the opposite of artificially toned then. OVER-DIPPED!

 

64, maybe 65

 

Sorry Rick but I have to go 64. The 2 dinks on the obverse and it looks like a weak strike hold me back from a 65. Great luster though.

 

64. Thomas took one on the chin. Pretty coin but I wouldn't pay 65 money with the ding.
Steve

 

why not just look at the label on the slab?

 

With the glare on the reverse view it looks like a no-steps (or 1 big one!).

 

65

 

Too much luster for that. Based on what I see..........'64.

 

66

 

I'd go with 64.