Toned Morgans gtg

Here we have 5 toned Morgan dollars all pcgs or ngc straight graded guess the grades

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

66
64
65
63
66

 

66*
63*
64
64
AU58

 

65
64
64
64
66

 

If you really want to get technical which ones have a bean too. There's more than one with a cac sticker

 

65 CAC
64
65
63 CAC
64

All beautiful coins, but I really like the first one!

 

64
62
65
64
65 (If coins could talk, maybe this one cold tell us who puked on it)

The second coin is a 62 IMO, which might be an unpopular opinion. The thing is, the obverse is marred and would grade 60, while the reverse would grade 64. It's a 62 to me.

 

66
63 with a color bump to 64
64, but possibly color bumped to 65
UNC details, damaged (in my opinion). But, you said straight grade... 62? 63?
64, Puked on

 

How could we guess a bean without knowing the baseline grades?

 

There is also absolutely nothing technical about the CAC sticker. They are all original, NT coins, with good eye appeal (except the last one. Yuck). Assuming the assigned grade is correct, any of the other four could be eligible for a CAC.

 

Actually the last one is a bit better in hand. Some interesting opinions so far. There's one I don't agree with the technical grade on I think it got an color and eye appeal bump a point

 

Here's another image of the 89 obverse

 

Can you give us different/better pictures? In the posted pictures, the coin looks completely lifeless, like it has been dipped poorly and retoned. In hand, if the luster is good, it may appear nicer - but I'm still not a fan of the splotchiness, or the muted color scheme (especially in comparison to the others you have posted here).

Really? That would NEVER happen! I am shocked!

 

Haha, you were posting at the same time as me. That is a better picture, in terms of showing life and luster. I still like it at 64, though.

 

We were thinking alike. It's no monster toner but it's a decent original coin

 

Might guess later, but not just yet. I just wanted to say I love the 1880-S and the top 1884-O. 1887 is no slouch either.

 

(really like this one )

 

65
63
64
62
64

 

BTW Bill, I think the 1887p was struck through grease on the reverse, either that, or its the weakest strike I have ever seen on a Morgan

 

65 * CAC
64 * CAC
65+
64* CAC
65. CAC

Beautiful coins!!!!!!