Is this coin a 'Nero' or a 'Seleucid'

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Topcat7, Feb 15, 2016.

  1. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    This is what My 2 x 2 information sheet looks like.

    Magical Snap - 2016.02.16 10.19 - 083.jpg
    My question is:- Is it O.K. to file this coin under 'Nero' (as all/most of my Romans are filed under rulers), or should it be filed under the city (like some of my Greeks)?

    Magical Snap - 2016.02.16 10.26 - 084.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

  4. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    The type was struck in that region/city when it was semi-autonomous. I can't read the date below the altar. The type was struck during the reign of more than one emperor, Nero being one of them.

    I see them described as REGION, CITY, (year), during the time of (emperor)

    As for your question regarding where to file it, I'm not sure if they are usually considered provincials or Greeks. You could try browsing some old CNG auctions to see where they put it (they present the lots in a certain order). I'll do that in a few minutes and report back :)

    Edited: CNG catalogs them as Roman Provincial.

    Edited again: Regarding your title question, it is not a Seleucid :D

    I have thoroughly messed up this reply and am going to step away now :joyful::joyful:
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2016
    ancientnut, Cyrrhus and Theodosius like this.
  5. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    Seleucia Pieria was a town in the Syrian tetrapolis that included Apameia, Laodicea, and Antioch. It was founded by Seleucus I Nicator, hence it's name. In the 1st Century BC, Pompey allowed it to be governed by a descendant of Seleucus I, but it was unquestionably under Roman control. By the time of Nero, the Seleucids had all but disappeared. So definitely Roman Provincial.
     
    Cyrrhus likes this.
  6. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    @> TIF, >JA - Thank-you, Thank-you.

    You have answered my question and you have given me the information I was looking for.

    TIF, I WILL go to CNG to see how they list them to see if I can get any other ideas.
    (I should have thought of that first. Note: I did go there to find the coin, but I neglected to take notice of their 'listing' practice.)
     
  7. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Roman Imperials always have a fuzzy starting line to me. Do you start classifying them after Augustus as Roman coins, or when Rome effectively became the rulers? In many cases there is not a hard and fast rule. I believe CNG and others start classifying them as Provincial sometime around the Civil War onward.

    Nevertheless, this was struck under Nero, so every dealer I have ever seen classifies them as Roman Provincial.
     
  8. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    Thanks for joining the discussion, Medoraman. It is good to know what the predominating view is, especially on something that is not black or white.
     
  9. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I tend to file semi-autonomous coins at the end of the Provincials rather than mixing them with the ruler's portrait coins. This is convenient when you really do not know when a coin as made. My recent purchase is this Smyrna with bust of the Senate which I believe is from the time of Valerian but I am less than certain.
    gi2745fd0529.jpg
     
    stevex6 and Bing like this.
  10. Cyrrhus

    Cyrrhus Well-Known Member

    Hello,

    Sorry I am late today at home sorting my coins again, I have three of the one's Doug shows, def. Roman provincial from Syria, one of my fav coins !!
    Myne IMG_0045.JPG IMG_0046.JPG are all a little bit different.
     
    stevex6 and zumbly like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page