I could not match this with any photo s I could find. Wexler lists 116 different DDR's for this date but only has pics for a few of them.
I have used this as a guide and read http://www.error-ref.com to study why and how it occurs, but I still get confused. Some coins I find 'Look' like the hub doubling, but keep being MD.
HUGE difference between these pics and the coin in the OP. In these pics, notice the die wear on the "secondary" image? That proves that the doubling is part of the die itself. There are also split serifs (most prominently, look at the bottom of the C and the middle bar of the E - they are complete secondary images). On the image in the OP, the appearance is flat (not part of the die). The strike doubling also shows no split serifs (that is, there is no "separation" of the images, which is a key characteristic of hub doubling).
I just love the effort you (presumably) put into this illustration as it precisely defines machine doubling.
I got it from THIS forum under the top posts about doubled dies. I've seen it referred to many times in threads. So, it's not correct? No wonder I get confusing replays on what is or isn't DD.
here are some images from Wexler's site (for educational purposes) pictures 1, 3,5 are doubled dies...2,4, and 6 are MD. notice the difference? http://www.doubleddie.com/144822.html