Tiny Alexander III ???

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Topcat7, Jan 20, 2016.

  1. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    I bought this Alexander III without paying too much attention to the size and when it arrived (today) it was way more 'tiny' than any I have seen previously.

    Can anyone shed any light on this for me please?

    Alexander III (The Great)
    Obv: Heracles with Lionskin
    Rev: Bow in quiver, and Club
    Bronze 9mm x 7mm, 0.3 gm.

    (1) ALEXANDER III 'The Great' Heracles with lionskin-Bow and Quiver (O).png (1) ALEXANDER III 'The Great' Heracles with lionskin-Bow and Quiver (R).png

    for comparison, here it is next to a 'Standard' bronze coin 21mm., 6.0 gm.,

    Magical Snap - 2016.01.20 16.44 - 023.png
     
    WDF, Pishpash, stevex6 and 11 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Wow, I think you may have nabbed something very special, despite its condition :). Congratulations! You didn't state the metal in your post but it appears to be silver.

    Such tiny Macedonian (Seleukid?) fractionals are not common. They were not hoarded like the tetradrachms and drachms. I don't have the knowledge to confirm exactly what you have, but possibly a hemiobol or quarter obol, from Alexander the Great or Seleukos I Nikator. There is inconsistency of naming the denomination (by weight) from the few similar coins I've found this morning. Searching the usual internet resources, I'm not finding much.

    Perhaps the best book for investigating your coin would be M.J. Price, The Coinage in the Name of Alexander the Great and Philip Arrhidaeus. London. 1991. I don't think it is available to read online. If I'm wrong about that, I hope someone posts a link.

    Here's something similar, from Wildwinds:

    WW-SeleukosARfractional.jpg

    Sale: CNG 72, Lot: 884. Closing Date: Wednesday,
    14 June 2006. SELEUKID KINGS of SYRIA. Seleukos
    I Nikator. 312-281 BC. AR Hemiobol (0.37 g,
    12h). Babylon I mint(?). Struck circa 312-300
    BC.Estimate $150 Sold For $200

    SELEUKID KINGS of SYRIA. Seleukos I Nikator.
    312-281 BC. AR Hemiobol (0.37 g, 12h). Babylon I
    mint(?). Struck circa 312-300 BC. Head of Herakles
    right, wearing lion skin / Club, quiver, and bow;
    lion’s head to left. Cf. SC 85; cf. Price 3706.
    Good VF, toned. An apparently unpublished
    denomination of a very rare type.

    From the Robert A. Weimer Collection.

    Copyright © CNG 2002-2005

    By permission of CNG, www.cngcoins.com.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2016
    Topcat7, Pishpash, stevex6 and 7 others like this.
  4. paschka

    paschka Well-Known Member

  5. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    I have both volumes as PDF files, I got them on line some time ago and not sure when.
     
    Topcat7 and paschka like this.
  6. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    In their day, small coins played a big part in daily commerce but tetradrachms were like hundred dollar bills are today. Most were hoarded in pots while small coins were spent until they were lost. I have seen a bag with a thousand tetradrachms in it but never a bag of obols.

    My little one is an obol of Alexander III just like the tetradrachms but smaller (0.6g).
    g02165bb3062.jpg
     
    dlhill132, Pishpash, stevex6 and 5 others like this.
  7. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    So the OP coin is an obol or a hemiobol???
     
  8. Aidan_()

    Aidan_() Numismatic Contributor

    Definitely looks like the Seleucid coin TIF used. It's a cool lil' thing! ;)
     
  9. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    See my post above.
     
    Topcat7 likes this.
  10. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    Very nice pick up TC!
    One question though: is the metal bronze or silver?
     
  11. ancientnut

    ancientnut Well-Known Member

    From the OP: "Bronze 9mm x 7mm, 0.3 gm."
     
    Topcat7 likes this.
  12. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    I firgued as much but
     
    Topcat7 likes this.
  13. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I think he is wrong and believe it is silver (although I did overlook where he said "bronze" in the OP :D)
     
    Topcat7 and stevex6 like this.
  14. zumbly

    zumbly Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana

    I'm with TIF, that looks like toned silver to me.
     
    Topcat7 and TIF like this.
  15. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    Last edited: Jan 20, 2016
    Topcat7 and TIF like this.
  16. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    that is a very cool little coin TC. i didn't know (or remember?) that these came in "fun size"!
     
    Topcat7 likes this.
  17. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    Awesome => super lil' OP-winner ... congrats Topcat7 (very cute)
     
    Topcat7 likes this.
  18. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    Alexander types also come in half and quarter of the bronze issues. I have one, but no photographed yet. They are scarce to rare like the silver issues.
     
  19. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    Sorry for the delay everyone. (Comes from me being on the other side of the world - 'Down Under'. I am asleep when you are awake.) Now:-

    @> TIF, The coin is (heavily) toned which makes me want to say Bronze, but it is VERY smooth and could be toned silver, but the toning is very even over the whole coin. I have referred to the places that you mentioned and I cannot find a reference to a bronze obol, so without 'scratching' the surface to find what is underneath, is there any way that I could tell?
    I haven't tried to find M.J. Price, The Coinage in the Name of Alexander the Great and Philip Arrhidaeus. London. 1991. yet, but if Pish has it in PDF it is probably out there somewhere, for me to find. Thank-you for the help.

    Thanks TIF, Pish, M.M., Zumbly, Steve, Chris, et al.
     
    stevex6 likes this.
  20. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I'm pretty sure it is silver (look at the flow lines-- that's not something I recall seeing on worn bronzes). Plus, the overall look and and wear suggest silver. To satisfy yourself you could try treating the coin or a portion of it with a weak acid or Tarn-X (or other silver polish). If you do that I'd give it several soaks in distilled water afterwards.

    A half or quarter-sized denomination of the bronze would still be significantly larger than your itty bitty coin.

    All signs point to this being silver rather than bronze.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2016
    brassnautilus and Topcat7 like this.
  21. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    I have Price of course, but without some more devices clear it will be some work and a couple hours or more to find the reference. Just dont have the time. Sorry! No, Price isnt available as a PDF, it is copyrighted. Buy the book!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page