This is a Type II (1855) 3 cent silver. I have noticed on this and several other 3 cent silver coins, fine parallel lines between the numeral "I's" on the reverse. There are also lines that appear to be tilted shadows of the numerals. I didn't see these in any of the examples on coinfacts.com. Does anyone know what these lines are? They seem too regular to be an artifact. Are they part of the design?
My first thought was die clash, but the lines are on the high points, not the low points -- exactly opposite of what you would expect in a clash. So my best guess is post-mint damage. Perhaps two coins were pressed together strongly enough to empart part of the shield into the reverse?...Mike
Leadfoot's first thought was correct. The lines are from the shield on the obverse and the marks are from a clashed die. These clash marks are relatively common on three cent silvers.
I've never seen that, I'm going to have to pull out my trimes and give them a peek. Since it is so common as you say I'm guessing it doesn't impart any additional value, but what if they're not there, more value?
There were not many 3 centers struck between 1854 and 1873 and therefore not many different dies were used to strike the coins. Which means most varieties would be quite prevelant in relation to the coin's population.
I'm sure that's it. The extra markings do correspond to the shield, but not quite lined up with the obverse. Any impact on the value, either positive or negative?
dreamer: They are really neat to collect, but, I have never paid extra for a clashed die, and probably never would. However, no negative impact on the value. Of course the above statement does not include the unusual clashes with (for example) Flying eagle cents clashed with other denominations. For further info check cherrypickers guide. If I have time later I will post the three unusual varieties that are highly collectible.
