Show off a "Problem Coin"

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by coinman1234, Mar 26, 2015.

  1. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Any shot at a 69 or 70? :hilarious:
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    Upon realizing I estimated the copper nugget to grade MS68, I'd say it has a good shot at MS69! MS70 is a bit of a stretch,though, because if you look at it long enough you can see at least one or two minor imperfections.
     
  4. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

  5. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I see a 14-D sticking out of the left side. That's quite a good score there.
     
    Omegaraptor and coinman1234 like this.
  6. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

  7. KarlB

    KarlB Active Member

    I like this idea.

    I have a set of Washington clads taken out of circulation--the more worn and/or beat up, the better.

    It's all part of the balance: MS collections, and filler/cull collections.
     
  8. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Nah...those are just "floaters" from stareing at it too long.
     
    NSP likes this.
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Anyone wanna guess what the problem is?

    [​IMG]
     
    coinman1234 likes this.
  10. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Counter damage?
     
    Lehigh96 likes this.
  11. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

  12. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Did it come back AT?
     
  13. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    That didn't take long, lol.

    [​IMG]
     
    jester3681 likes this.
  14. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Spots to left of Monticello? Hits?

    Is that MD on the top left of Monticello?
     
  15. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    I said that there was "MD" on the coin, I mean't machine doubling though, not MD as in Machine Damage. :)
     
  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Presented as a problem coin, it was obvious. Had you gone GTG, I am not sure what I would have said.
     
  17. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Nah, SEDGS is more reliable...

    [​IMG]

    You can't get more accurate than this...
     
  18. rooman9

    rooman9 Lovin Shiny Things

    That is just painful to look at.
     
    JPeace$ and coinman1234 like this.
  19. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Yeah I really like that 94 too. A little porous but not horrible
     
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Too bad they cleaned it cause that ones got a GREAT strike for one of these
     
    JPeace$, jester3681 and coinman1234 like this.
  21. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Agree, Probably done back when they thought "cleaning" was good for a coin's value.

    Nobody would clean a coin that rare now... right?? :):rolleyes:
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page