A U.S. Congressman once complained that U.S. coin designs were "crummy." I disagree; I would have said "boring." (BTW, he was speaking of the "States" quarters series.)
Regarding your 1876H, you mentioned "Also has some missing parts of the letters on the obverse" These I believe are: 1. left serif at base of T in Victoria missing - Zoell H3n 2. incomplete D in DEI and CANADA - Zoell S3b (later corrected) I have examples of both #2 coins Unfortunately the Zoell books have "disappeared" from my library so I cannot confirm my attributions. One other point, look at the "weak" Ds in DEI and CANADA on your 1899.
Actually, all of the 1876's have the left foot of the T in Victoria missing (it broke off the hub that strikes the working dies)... then 3 of the dies had the foot re-engraved, so they are much scarcer. The missing left part of the T foot is the "norm" for the '76's.
Here's a detail from my 1859 DP#3... not new, just a good match for the Charlton's photo on page 40 (2015 ed.)...
A CANADIAN LARGE CENT FROM 1859 IS LISTED HERE : http://giladzuckerman.webs.com/mercuguinness.html#CANADA
While exploring and examining with my new digital microscope I 'found' these, not new acquisitions but new varieties for my varieties collection: == Prince Edward Island 1871 1 cent == Canada 1859 1 cent