Nice example of machine doubling

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by billy b, Oct 14, 2015.

  1. billy b

    billy b Active Member

    Image720.jpg worthless but it look's cool
     
    dwhiz and Jdiablo30 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    Wow TRUST is crazy looking and one of the most severe MDs ive seen. I'd buy that from you for 5$ lol.
     
  4. billy b

    billy b Active Member

    What do you think about this one? Do you think it's a DDR or MD? Image714.jpg
     
  5. Old Error Guy

    Old Error Guy Well-Known Member

    I've never understood why these are "worthless", except some error poobah declared them so fifty years ago. Personally, I find them imminently collectible and am willing to pay for great examples.

    Actually, you can find some decent sales on eBay, properly described as MD. This s a nice example.
     
    jay4202472000 likes this.
  6. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Check ebay sold listings. MD sells even when correctly described
     
    Old Error Guy likes this.
  7. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    they are worthless because they are not errors, most are from die deterioration because in trying to save money the mint uses the dies far past their limits, while searching nickels i find dozens an dozens of coins far worse than the OP's...
    1999-1.jpg 1999-2.jpg 1999-3.jpg 1999P.jpg
     
    medjoy and billy b like this.
  8. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    IMO those selling these should be banned, whether "correctly" described or not...
     
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    MD's are a neat thing to add to any collection.
     
    Old Error Guy likes this.
  10. billy b

    billy b Active Member

    Thanks Ken. That's a very nice example.Thanks for sharing that with us! What about that block button.I'am just kidding. I've got to do something too kill time,can't watch TV anymore.Wow do they really think we the people are that stupid?
     
  11. Old Error Guy

    Old Error Guy Well-Known Member

    This "discussion" shows a very limited and somewhat inaccurate understanding of "machine doubling". I'm taking the liberty of borrowing from the preamble on the error-ref section on these coins:

    Definition: This form of doubling typically results from vibration or instability affecting the die, die assembly, or press frame. It has also occasionally been blamed on a coin sticking to the anvil die during ejection (“ejection doubling”).

    Anyone genuinely interested in understanding what's going on would be well advised to check good references (here is one http://www.error-ref.com/machine-doubling/)

    Here is the section on die deterioration: http://www.error-ref.com/die-deterioration-doubling/
     
    jay4202472000 likes this.
  12. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

  13. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    jay4202472000 likes this.
  14. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    I for one bought one of those 60 count coin albums and put any MD,die deterioration doubling etc in them as a form of reference. Having examples of each type can come in helpful down the road.
     
  15. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    cuds are from broken dies and are considered errors, mint employees job to replace broken dies and if one keeps striking coins then he's not doing his job, an error..
    cuds always involve the rim and carry a premium, die chips do not involve the rim and may or may not carry a premium... http://cuds-on-coins.com/
     
  16. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    and the day will come when you realize you no longer need that reference (as you have it memorized or use the multitude of online references) and put that album to good use instead of using it for coins that are better off spent...
     
  17. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    But how about when I hand it down to the next generation. Isn't it all about preservation in numismatics ? How will the up and coming generation learn if perfect examples for them to learn on are destroyed or lost to time? I'm pretty good with knowing the difference now. Have been around coins a long time. Just had a lot of coins with MD and what not that needed a album.
     
  18. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    thats fine as long as there is something with those coins to inform the next generation of exactly what they are, seen it many times when someone inherits coins an think they have something great when in reality they have nothing at all...then again, how will they feel when they learn they've inherited an album full of coins worth only face value..
     
  19. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    I actually have on the front of the album "forms of non valuable doubling" I don't go out of my way to pursue it. If I come across one ,like above that can be confused fora DD I'd like to have it. I guess its something to keep me busy numismatic wise while saving for bigger $$$ purchases. Most of them are crh finds. The only value they have are for its silver content.
     
    ken454 likes this.
  20. chuck123

    chuck123 Active Member

  21. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    Worthless, only in the numismatic "premium" sense because if folks were to examine hundreds or thousands of coins, they would see that this is a quite common occurrence.

    There are some unusual examples out there.

    1967 SMS-02 Motto Right.JPG
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page