Is this a bugs bunny clash?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by bsowa1029, Oct 2, 2015.

  1. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    The mark on the reverse, just below the eagle's right wing, that is normally visible on the variety is clearly visible. However, the fangs aren't as noticeable. I think I can see one tiny little baby fang poking out.

    Opinions?

    image.jpg image.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    The variety you speak of was caused by a die clash. The teeth are more prominent and I don't see it on yours so I'll say no. BTW, other dates on Franklins have the same die clash but are not as well known.
     
    Cochisz likes this.
  5. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    Here is an example of the Bugs Bunny 1955 P... notice how drastically different it is from your example. Yours may be one of the obverse die clashes known for Franklins, but it's not the Bugs Bunny.

    1955 Franklin Half Bugs Bunny.jpg
     
    Cochisz and dwhiz like this.
  6. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    What is the date of this coin? Different dates have different appearances, some of them are quite dramatic and some are subtle. Obviously, the prominent ones will be more in demand. Is there any clashing behind Franklin's head?

    I'm inclined to say yes, but without know what date it is, I don't know if its one that is designated.
     
    dwhiz likes this.
  7. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

  8. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    bsowa1029 likes this.
  9. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    It's a 55
     
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Haha, that's apparent in your new pictures ;)

    The 55 Bugs has at least 2 different dies. The prominent one was posted earlier in the thread, and is worth a larger premium (for obvious reasons). I believe you have the second, less prominent one. It's still a Bugs, but is the less desirable one. To confirm, look behind Frank's head at the second curl (draw a horizontal line from his mouth to the back of his head). There should be clashing there as well, from the motto (the wings of the eagle are what give him his buck-teeth).
     
  11. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Would this one carry any sort of premium?
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    If it is truly a Bugsie, then yes. But it will be less than the other one.

    I can't tell for certain from your pics, but I am leaning towards yes on this one being a Bugs.
     
  13. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    It's in a pci holder now. Would this one be worth sending to pcgs or NGC if they would label it as a bugs?
     
  14. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    1.) Make certain that it is, in fact, a bugs first.

    2.) Make certain that the TPG of your choice designates this die pair (NGC only recently started attributing Bugs, and I'm not sure they attribute all of them. As much as I hate to say this, PCGS is ahead of NGC on this front - they designate most/all of them).

    3.) Make certain that it is worth the cost of submitting. You'll have to pay for variety attribution as well, which is an added fee (and not cheap!) Depending on what you paid for the coin, the cost of submitting may eat up the entire premium of the variety. Most variety specialists are used to not having coins designated, and will pay the premium for an undesignated coin if they are convinced it is the real deal.
     
  15. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Thanks for the info!
     
  16. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    @physics-fan3.14 checked near UNUM and behind Franklin's head. Definitely some clashing going on. Bens hair can be seen below the middle part of the M and between the upper left part of the M and the B and parts of the U and M can be seen behind his head.

    image.jpeg image.jpeg
     
    ThinnPikkins and micbraun like this.
  17. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    In that case, yes, this is definitely the weaker Bugsie. And its an attractive example, too.
     
  18. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    Wascaely wabbitt
     
  19. jay4202472000

    jay4202472000 Well-Known Member

    That's beautiful!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page