Need help with a Spanish Netherlands patagon

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by H8_modern, Sep 29, 2015.

  1. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    I have this coin that I got just because it is early, large and interesting. Now I've decided to sell it because it is not in any of my varied spheres of interest. The problem is that it should be KM 53.1 but the date is not listed in Krause or NGC. This coin type in NGC ranges from $275-950 in VF depending on rarity.

    So, do I have a counterfeit, an extreme rarity or something in between. Or am I just wrong about what it is? Thanks for any help.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. doppeltaler

    doppeltaler Well-Known Member

    It looks genuine to me. However there was no Philip VII around 1659 i could find.
     
  4. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    Could it be a 2 rather than a 9, ie - 1652?
     
  5. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    I just looked at a 1652 Patagon and the 2 was quite different.
    Interesting.
     
  6. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    Different on the one I just looked up as well, and the 6....
     
  7. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    .
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2015
  8. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    Neat coins, but how are they related to the OP coin?
     
  9. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    They're not, posted in the wrong thread:shame:
     
  10. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

  11. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    Aha! I thought maybe I was going crazy.
     
  12. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    I'm pretty sure it's just a beat up IIII, not VII but I do see what you were thinking.
     
  13. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    I try to think about what other dates it could be but it looks pretty clear.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  14. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    I think you should send the coin in to a TPG, honestly.
    If it's the first known 1659, it could be worth a fair bit.
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

  16. KurtS

    KurtS Die variety collector

    I have no knowledge specific to this coin, but generally speaking...sometimes digits are inverted on dies. If that's even possible in this case, a 1656 erroneously dated "1659" would stand out if no coins were dated for that year...
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    As I said the coin does exist, it's not an inverted date. Delmonte's, Silver Benelux was published in 1967 and the coin, 1659, is listed there as having 2 varieties, Del. 293 and Del. 295. They were minted in Brabrant by the way. And there are other books published long before Delmonte that list the coin.

    Just because NGC and Krause don't list it, doesn't mean a coin doesn't exist.
     
  18. Yarb0

    Yarb0 Member

    Exactly! I've spent a lot of time trolling NGC and the catalogues for certain coins very similar to these mentioned in the post and have not been able to find it until I came across acsearch.
     
  19. KurtS

    KurtS Die variety collector

    Just tossing that out there--I stand corrected. :) I have also noticed that NGC/Krause doesn't list everything.
     
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Krause isn't intended to list everything. While it would seem like they would list all dates of the things that they do include, Krause is intended to be more of a generalist catalog. It's like the Red Book for world coins. If you want more details, or a complete listing, always consult the specialist references.
     
  21. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    Thanks, good info. That's a reference book that I don't have and hadn't even heard of. Always something good to learn here.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page