D over S 1955 your opinions?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by dak, Apr 28, 2007.

  1. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    Ok found this in this mornings hunt. Whatcha think?? Looks pretty clear to me, but I know there will always be skeptics... Honestly... you think I found it?? I'm making a preliminary attribution of cherrypickers' : FS-034 aka CONECA: OMM-001 ... I'm curious if you guys agree...
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    one more photo of it
     

    Attached Files:

  4. johndo

    johndo New Member

    imo, I would say no.

    John
     
  5. jody526

    jody526 New Member

    OK. I believe it is one of the 1955 D/S RPM varieties, but I couldn't tell you which one.
    My reference shows 10 different '55 D/S Varieties, and one D/D/S.
    They all look similar, with subtle differences.

    I'd recommend James Wiles', The Jefferson Nickel RPM Book, if you're seriously interested in that aspect of nickel collecting.

    OK. Bwuuuhaaaa!
     
  6. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    I've got a picture from one of my books, and this coin looks identical to the listing, I've been a roll searcher for years just looking for key dates and older coins, but I am still new to the aspect of RPM and OMM and trying to learn the fine details of it... Is it legal for me to post the picture from my book for you guys to compare it too without infringing on copyright laws?
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Technically, no it is not.
     
  8. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    Thats what I thought... Thats why I didn't just post it... Thanks...
     
  9. Is it legal if you put the title of the book, author and publisher? Or are we needing an express written consent kind of thing?

    Michael
     
  10. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    U.S. copyright law protects original works of authorship in any tangible medium of expression. The publisher probably has a copyright assignment from the author of the photograph and Dak would require a copyright waiver to publish same here. He did good by erring on the side of caution.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page