Was I wrong about cell phones?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by dougsmit, Jun 1, 2015.

  1. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    i hate to get off topic, but I couldn't find a thread on photographing coins. What do you recommend? My phone takes horrible pictures for these small items - my camera works okay, but I suspect I need a better setup (like a light box or something). Would you recommend one of those USB microscopes with the LED log on the end?

    To keep it about Ancients, here's my most recent purchase, photographed with my 10 year-old point & click:
     
    zumbly, stevex6, Ancientnoob and 2 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't bother with a USB microscope. They are OK for using them for identifications, but they take horrible pics.
     
    TIF likes this.
  4. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    I disagree completely.

    While pns do allow you to use extra small focal distances, there's so much diffraction and ISO noise the pictures just aren't clean like your previous taken with DSLR.
    To untrained eyes they might looked "clear", but side by side the difference in sharpness is pretty remarkable.

    I think, generally clear vs. clinically sharp.
     
  5. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I give up. I can't get a decent looking shoot with the telephone camera and this is the best I can get using my Olympus point and shoot.

    Phokis, Federal Coinage.jpg
     
    Ancientnoob likes this.
  6. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    dude, bing, it's not the camera. Doug's lights are pro. He can take picture with a 2mp point and shoot and it would still look money.
     
  7. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I am no photographer. And, in fact, I pretty much hate taking pictures. But I do want to take my own pics of my coins. They will just have to be the best I can get. I have messed around with various lighting, tenting, backgrounds for more hours than I care to think about. This is it for me.
     
  8. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    setting up illumination for macro shots is a science. Even pros that aren't specialized in this (ie. portrait or landscape people) can have a hard time.

    It's a lot of work even if ones knows exactly how to do it...
    If you are concerned, for selling online or something, just scan. A $200 scanner (especially ones that can focus to a little distance/height) get the job done just as well.
     
  9. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I don't generally sell my coins. This is for my own cataloging purposes.
     
  10. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    it seems like scanner pics always look pretty poor to me, low resolution. is that not always the case?
     
  11. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    This coin photo isnt that bad. It just needed a little TLC.

    Menanderc.jpg
     
    zumbly, TIF and FitzNigel like this.
  12. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    Don't give up but don't give in either.

    Phokis Federal Coinage.jpg
     
  13. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I have way, way too many pages on coin photography and keep telling myself I will combine all and delete the old news. It has not happened yet.
    http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/coinphoto2011ez.html

    If you don't like that page, there are several more that it links to at the bottom. Every time I do a page, I change an opinion and the page becomes outdated.

    I agree with brassnautilus about bigger sensors being better but I'm too lazy to tear down my set up every time I want the good camera for something else so I leave an old 1.6 crop sensor camera on the rig and us it most of the time. Below are samples from my full frame dSLR (a now out of date Canon 5DmkII). In each case, the cropped section at the bottom is 100% size as shot. The coins are much reduced and combined to get both sides in one shot. The full size files make very nize 20x30 pints if you like to see the faults on the coins. I have very few coins that look good that large. Very few!

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    zumbly, Ancientnoob, TIF and 3 others like this.
  14. Whizb4ng

    Whizb4ng HIC SVNT DRACONES

    I really need to learn how to do the black background. Currently I am photo editing illiterate.
     
    Ancientnoob likes this.
  15. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    a 4800X4800 scanner for example, that's 23,040,000 pixels, or 23MP. For an image area no bigger than closeup lenses (semi macro distances) would cover, so it's comparable to a full frame DSLR.

    Scanners use a series of tiny CMOS to slew through the image, at minimum focal distances, each capture only tiny tiny size of image at each interval.
    The CMOS of a point and shoot is only size of your pinky finger nail, or even smaller, and it takes the whole picture in 1 go. That's much lower definition, with much more diffraction and noises.
     
    chrsmat71 likes this.
  16. Ancientnoob

    Ancientnoob Money Changer

    Practice.

    http://apps.pixlr.com/editor/
     
  17. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    Doug's black background is srsly kickass. Even more amazing is the fact he gets it done naturally with long relief distance of background with his jig, instead of using digital tools.

    and Doug, 5DII is just as good as DIII, for stationary shots. I see no need to upgrade either. Until a medium format DSLR becomes practical at least.
     
  18. Whizb4ng

    Whizb4ng HIC SVNT DRACONES

    Do you just use the erase tool to remove the old background and fill it with the black? Or is there a magic button that I am missing.
     
  19. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    couldn't find the old tutorial, so I made a make-shift one

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    then do your thing with exposure or brightness adjustments on the selected area.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2015
    zumbly, Whizb4ng and Ancientnoob like this.
  20. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I strikes me as easier to shoot on a black background so you have less to clean up.
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  21. Whizb4ng

    Whizb4ng HIC SVNT DRACONES

    I think a large part of the troubles I am having is the poor background I am using. I also had no idea you could deselect with the lasso tool which will be greatly beneficial.

    Now when I upgrade my phone in the next month or two to the S5 I will have some semi-decent pictures!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page