AU58 or MS61/2... is the only difference these days eye appeal?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by C-B-D, Apr 11, 2015.

  1. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Seems like TPG's give MS grades to coins with slight wear, cabinet friction, whatever you want to call it, as long as they have eye appeal. Here's one of mine going to PCGS next week. I think it's an AU58 but may get a MS61 due to eye appeal and retained luster. What do you guys and gals think?
    DSCN6907.JPG DSCN6908.JPG
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2015
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. frostyluster

    frostyluster Member

    Probably low MS.
     
  4. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Generally, I agree with you regarding the grades they assign to borderline coins, but in this particular case I think AU58.
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    What's up with the obv central device CBD ? It looks like was sandblasted or acid etched or something.
     
    Tater, furham, tommyc03 and 1 other person like this.
  6. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    @C-B-D

    I don't know. I don't collect this series, but the obverse looks in bad shape to me. The central device looks very rough. It wouldn't surprise me if PCGS gave it a "Genuine" slab. Please post the results when you get it back. I'd love to know.

    Chris
     
    tommyc03 likes this.
  7. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I'm not sure. It's a little weakly struck on there but has some circulation roughness of some sort. I don't think it was acid treated. It is weird how that "graininess" isn't in the fields around Liberty. Could it be die erosion or something?
     
    tommyc03 likes this.
  8. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Will do. It'll be a while since I'm sending it economy.
     
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I agree!

    Chris
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    That's not from circulation buddy, somebody has done something to that coin.
     
    rzage likes this.
  11. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I'll send it off anyway. Will post results in several weeks when it gets back.
     
  12. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    How about this one? True AU58?
    DSCN6836.JPG DSCN6837.JPG
     
    micbraun likes this.
  13. frostyluster

    frostyluster Member

    Yep. That's a 55.
     
  14. frostyluster

    frostyluster Member

    I noticed that too, but I have seen cleaned EF-40 commem halves in NGC 62 holders, so I doubt that this would have a problem with an MS grade. It was probably cyanided at some point.
     
  15. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I say most 58s deserve the 58 due ti what I call circulation hits on the field and devices . Here's an example of a 58 that deserves the 58 grade even with great luster and minimal wear.

    [​IMG]

    Image View: Normal | Medium | Large

    [​IMG]
     
    medjoy likes this.
  16. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'm thinking someone tried to give it a cameo look . I wonder if the fields are slightly PL .
     
  17. Bill1517

    Bill1517 Active Member

    In my opinion...not unc. Something funky with the obverse surface...
     
  18. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I'd really like to see examples of these!

    Chris
     
    rzage likes this.
  19. treylxapi47

    treylxapi47 Well-Known Member Dealer

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1428800988.339699.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1428800999.459184.jpg

    This is my favorite AU-58
     
  20. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Golly, I think you reached the first plateau, lol. If it gets MS, it will get 63 or 64.
     
  21. frostyluster

    frostyluster Member

    Lol, I didn't buy them, they were ugly hairlined problem coins! Sorry, I saw them in a coin store. I'll see if I can find one on the internet.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page