I Think I Found a RPM. Attribution Help???

What do you you think? Any attribution help??

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

What's the date ?

 

Sorry, forgot to tell the date. 1962d

 

I don't think so. It looks more flat/shelf-like than an RPM. Like a tiny "D" on top of a bigger one. Could be wrong though

 

Never thought of that, your saying chance of MD. After looking I notice the size problem.

Any chance it is a RPM than??

 

Are you sure it's 1962? This is what a 1964 looks like. Almost like yours

 

Look at this thread from 2014 - https://www.cointalk.com/threads/1964-d-roosevelt-dime-rpm-006.245076/

 

I'm positive it is a 1962

 

While you could be, from what I can see, I don't believe you are wrong on this one.

 

Look at the Obverse for the markers - I want to share this site with you - http://www.varietyvista.com/1962DRPM006 dime.htm

 

The original pictured coin doesn't match that one I don't think.

 

I agree, I think the mint mark punch has wear deterioration

 

There is machine doubling all over the reverse leaves, torch. That's a hard call. Looks like a rpm.

 

I'm not an RPM expert. Learning myself. Just trying to give the OP some direction. Would be nice to find one

 

The original mint mark, has raised areas all around the mm. The pictured one only to the south and east.

 

I'm understanding now. So shelf like look. This is what is meant by wear deterioration on the mintmark then?

 

What's the verdict, MD or rpm?

 

I agree as I had a roll of unc.56 D Nickels about 20 of them Looked To Be RPM. After sending them in all were MD from die deterioration .
I was talking today with a member here today on the phone. Our conversation was about how your eyes and brain do plays tricks on you at times.
You look at a coin and see something. Yet another person may not see what you're seeing . I find this a lot in images. As you really need to train both eyes and brain to look at it both ways.
I do find that sometimes it's hard to train your self as once convenience you're more likely to go with what you think you see as apposed to what's really there.

 

Looks like machine doubling. Note the step down and the mint mark size is reduced.

 

Thanks guys, I am happy to know what I have, even when it is just a machine doubled coin.