Tiny Roman Symbols

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by 7Calbrey, Jan 5, 2015.

  1. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Weighing just 1.12 g., this tiny coin has interesting symbols on the reverse. Beside the cross, there's a distinctive star, in addition to something I can't recognize in or below the hand of the person holding the cross. The obverse also shows the unidentified Roman Emperor with a sign to the right. Could you please assist me to identify the Emperor and the signs all together. Thank you.. Charles TIR O.jpg TIr R.jpg
     
    stevex6, swamp yankee and Okidoki like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

  4. askea

    askea Active Member

    Leo I, AE4, Constantinople, 457-474 AD.
    D N LEO, pearl diademed, draped, cuirassed bust right / Leo standing facing, head right, holding long cross in right and placing left hand on head of kneeling captive. Star in left field. RIC X 701.
     
    chrsmat71 likes this.
  5. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    Oh yeah - very good!
    [​IMG] LEO I. 457-474 AD. pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right, DN L-EO / Emperor standing, holding a long cross and placing his left hand on captive, star in the left field, CON in exergue. 8mm, 0.8 grams.Mint ofConstantinople, RIC 702.

    Info and picture found at: http://www.ancientcoins.ca/RIC/RIC10/RIC10_LeoE.htm
     
    stevex6 likes this.
  6. askea

    askea Active Member

    Not sure about the RIC number though.
     
  7. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Thanks. It's likely to be RIC 703 because of the star to the left field of the reverse. But my coin weighs 1.12 g. and not 0.8 g. Could that make any significant difference.
     
  8. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    That's quite a difference in weight. Even back then the coins had to weigh a specific weight to maintain their monetary value as even bronze was an expensive metal in the early years of AD.
     
  9. askea

    askea Active Member

    What is the diameter of your coin?
     
  10. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    Yeah I see what you mean - coin in your pictures seem a little different on reverse than what was pictured in the article - who knows how many variations of BC & early AD coins were struck.
     
  11. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    By the time of Leo, quality control at the mint was bad enough that many coins that survive do not have all the details needed to be 100% certain of the RIC number. Experienced collectors (not I) make better guesses on some than guys like me. Sometimes we get lucky and get a letter of the mintmark that gives it away (top); sometimes it is a guess by style or we just have to be happy saying it is Leo from a mint to be named later if we get good at it. rx8190bb1756.jpg rx8200bb1807.jpg

    Sometimes we get lucky and the mintmark is gone but there is another clue like the one below from Constantinople which used a lambda for the L in Leo on some coins. These are neat coins for people who like to chase mysteries. They are not good for condition oriented collectors.
    rx8180bb1755.jpg
     
    askea, stevex6 and Bing like this.
  12. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Diameter is 11 mm.
    Charles
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page