Is this a die clash

never found one but I hope this is one

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

YES! It looks like a minor one to me!

 

Looks like PIDT to me (progressive indirect design transfer). See here:

http://www.error-ref.com/progressive-indirect-design-transfer/

 

Sweet cool find thanks

 

Not a clash. Looks like indirect design transfer.
EDIT - Awww crap, jay beat me to it

 

Ok worth more than 1 cent?

 

I don't think so. From jay's link: Since coins that are in a Late Die State (LDS) develop this trait, it is considered a form of die deterioration.

 

Aww man still a cool coin

 

if you collect its worth keeping if you don't get rid of it for as much as you can...cheers

 

Oh I collect I have a penny box from the bank (25$) full of wheats I have picked up the past few years and just rolled them up just going through them tonight

 

I have over $50 in wheats that at some point I want to go back through and check for errors and varieties. I just keep searching and adding to it but never get to check them out

 

Whenever I get a box full I go through them

 

You are better than me I keep wondering what, if anything, I have in all those rolls. I just keep looking for more stuff though.

 

let me guess, it's a 1946... I just found one 10 minutes ago.

 

Haha nah wife got called into work nothing to do so I was like wth

 

It's a 1930s

 

And I was hoping it was a die clash cause that and a cud is about the only two errors I haven't ever found

 

The reason why I said 1946 is because that is the most common year for it too, I went through 1,000 wheaties just now and 4 of the 1946's had that effect on them. Plus, When I search that error online I see 1946 examples of that coin.

 

When it comes to cuds and die clashes, most of the ones I have found have been from the 83-84 time frame.

 

Thanks for that info