From the photos...high AU...if it is the holder interfering with the Obverse marks, could be MS but the ding in the shield would keep it MS62-64 (toning can hide many a mark, especially in photos). Personally not a fan of the toning, so would grade lower than some who likes it.
What's going on in the field in front of his nose? There are a lot of bagmarks on that coin. Strike looks average, luster is decent. The reverse is very darkly toned, and in my opinion has negative eye appeal. I can't quite tell if there is wear on the high points based on those pictures. It is either AU-58, or MS-62 for me (the negative eye appeal brings it down a point for me.)