Another Cheerio question

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by 75TA, Dec 21, 2014.

  1. 75TA

    75TA Member

    Hi guys,
    Just spent a considerable amount of time trying to understand what the FS-401 Cheerio is compared to FS-902 Cheerio. None of the searches made it very clear. Can someone explain? :bookworm: Thanks
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I don't see FS-401 listed in the CPG.
     
  4. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Like Larry said, there is no FS-401 listed in the CPG for a 2000-P Sacagawea "Cheerios" Dollar.

    Chris
     
  5. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    Coin Facts lists the piece only as FS-902, and usually when there are multiple reference numbers, it will provide them all.
     
  6. 75TA

    75TA Member

    Yes, CoinFact only listed 902 but...
    Currently on eBay...
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Dec 22, 2014
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    The 4th Edition of the CPG incorrectly listed it as FS-901, but that was eliminated in the 5th Edition. It's possible that PCGS made a mechanical error on data entry, making it 401 instead of 901. They aren't perfect, ya know.

    Chris
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
  8. 75TA

    75TA Member

    OK...maybe... sounds reasonable. I did read somewhere (i think) that they changed the number to 902 to avoid confusion with wounded eagle which is 901.
     
  9. Outlaw

    Outlaw Senior Member

    what is the wounded eagle?
    pictures if any one has them please
     
  10. 16d

    16d Member

    Here ya go
     

    Attached Files:

    • wou.jpg
      wou.jpg
      File size:
      16.3 KB
      Views:
      153
  11. 75TA

    75TA Member

  12. 75TA

    75TA Member

    so. to put closure on this. I tried but it was not meant to be.:dead:
    ...maybe next one I win!!

    lost_cherrio.jpg
     
  13. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    I agree with Chris; this is the most plausible explanation.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page