I'll guess ANACS said 65, but wouldn't be surprised with a 64 either (primarily for the digs on the cheek/neck). Nice coin, regardless, with a very strong strike!...Mike
yeah the nose and neck marks. on the flat surfaces you have some marks above the date, and some marks on the flat surface left of the nose. Ill go with MS-64.
I honestly think that PCGS would give it a 64 due to the marks on the face. However, it appears to be in a new ANACS holder, so I figure that they gave it a 65.
I see light bag-marks as I said left of the nose and under the neck. if it didnt have the dings on the neck and cheek, the light flat surface marks are light enough to get a 65? is that what you all are saying? what would get it a 66 or 67?