Another set: Agreed on that point! My home monitor doesn't really show that picture as bad as it really is. My work computer monitor makes coin photo B / 2 look like an dark oil spill. Here is another set (new coin) to compare: 1) 2)
#1 C is the best, it looks like some auction house pics I've seen. B has OK all around details but not quite as good as C. A stinks. Enough said #2 I ADORE REVERSE TWO. SHOW ME MORE. The first pair is nice but not exceptional. Glare on Liberty's chin ruins the second try. #3 ...
I think it's a great reason to pick #3 from Set1. In fact, that's my photo. Photo 2 was a bad photo I took, and photo 1 was the seller photo, which I thought was decent but not great.
The "seller's" pics look like those from Bozarth Numismatics (a bit of a pink cast, and they are scans not photographs as far as I know). That being said, I have looked at enough of their coins in hand and compared to their scans to know how to interpret what I am getting. Your pictures are far superior to the scans. No questions, ifs, ands, or buts.
Yes, you are correct, they are Bozarth. I have to say, they are in my top 2 favorite coin sellers. I do think there scans/pics are fairly accurate to what the coins looks like, without looking "too good". Meaning, I am NEVER disappointing by coins from them when they arrive. I also think my pics are very representative of a coin, whereas the PCGS TrueViews are "too sexy", and I have been disappointed after buying coins based on TrueViews. Thanks for the compliment, it means a lot coming from you, as your pics are outstanding!
Bozarths are one of the truly good dealers. I very vividly remember being impressed when I went by their table at FUN in January. They were one of the few dealers actively helping and engaging customers who were browsing. Nothing turns me off faster than a dealer who ignores potential customers. All very nice coins.