1884-s Morgan.

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Profit man, Jul 21, 2014.

Page 2 of 2
  1. MAKECENTS

    MAKECENTS Active Member

    yes it could be, but to tell you the truth if you get the right lighting and zoom setting the iPad takes an ok picture.
     
    MAKECENTS, Jul 21, 2014
    #21 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Profit man

    Profit man Active Member

    Grade?
     

    Attached Files:

    Profit man, Jul 21, 2014
    #22 + Quote Reply
  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Unfortunately, the photo issue is less the tool and more the technique.

    The 87 is nowhere remotely close to a 67, and for the 82, we're confronted by the same problem as before; the less than ideal images.
     
    BooksB4Coins, Jul 21, 2014
    #23 + Quote Reply
  5. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    1884-S? Ouch! Harshly cleaned AU.
     
    Tom B, Aug 1, 2014
    #24 + Quote Reply
  6. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    As for the 1884 S it has most definitely been harshly cleaned... The other 2 look to be low mint state... 62, 63 maybe... But it's impossible to tell from just those pics.
     
    LostDutchman, Aug 1, 2014
    #25 + Quote Reply
  7. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Take the coin out of the holder before taking pictures, otherwise all is a pure guess.
     
    Treashunt, Aug 2, 2014
    #26 + Quote Reply
  8. throwbackid

    throwbackid Well-Known Member

    That is almost humorous they grade that 87 at MS67.
     
    throwbackid, Aug 2, 2014
    #27 + Quote Reply
  9. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I could live with a TPG overgrading coins, but grading problem coins is a totally different story. How can that be good for business?
     
    micbraun, Aug 2, 2014
    #28 + Quote Reply
Page 2 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page