I for one agree completely. I am firmly of the opinion that a slabbed coin should never be considered to be worth a single cent more than the coin inside the slab is worth. Some people may pay a premium for certain slabs, but that's slab collecting, not coin collecting, as far as I'm concerned, and I have no interest in slab collecting lol...
I know, but the point I was trying to make was this. That just to get the slab you want to collect, you're going to have to pay $1450-$1500, maybe more, because of the melt value of the coin inside. That's a lot of money to spend for a slab collector when they can buy some other coin in the same type of slab for under $100, often well under.
Okay, I agree in terms of slab collectors, as it certainly is different and a curiosity for people who do collect slabs. What I was saying is that the coin is an attractive coin, and its attractiveness is being negatively affected by a damaged slab. Someone should put that coin in a new slab in my opinion and keep the old one--do a neat crack out.
As others have stated, this is known as a doily slab and was produced a few years after PCGS introduced their rattler slabs. The enormous crack on the reverse kills most any premium that would be associated with the holder, which is typically less than $100 per coin anyway.
Doily slabs are worth a premium, but not a huge one. They are not easily obtainable but if you keep looking you will find one (at least at the moment) so a badly damaged one like this one will lose most of its premium value. If this was a black NGC, it would still command a decent premium because they are MUCH MUCH harder to find