1873 Seated Quarter- what do you think it grades?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Apr 12, 2014.

  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'm rethinking my collecting again and have always loved the seated coins, thanks mostly to the 1853 with rays. So I've been doing some browsing on these Seated coins and came across this one.

    This coin has been graded and I do not own it but after looking at it, I don't know if I agree with the grade,

    what do you think it grades as?

    image.jpg image.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  4. Collector1966

    Collector1966 Senior Member

    I'll agree-- MS-63
     
  5. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

  6. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    63 but cleaned at some point.
     
  7. Yankee42

    Yankee42 Well-Known Member

  8. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Ms 61 it has a few pretty major dings and it's been dipped in the past but likely market acceptable
     
  9. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'm not seeing it..... Can anyone tell me where it's at?

    image.jpg
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I sure don't see any signs of corrosion so that may simply be a label mistake. But personally I would grade the coin as AU because of wear and a lack of luster. The lack of luster may be the real reason for the details grade, assuming it is a label mistake.
     
  11. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I agree with the grade--it has been cleaned IMHO.
     
  12. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    I'm seeing an MS details coin with something removed from the reverse. The holder appears to agree with this interpretation and it looks like the coin was lightly corroded (perhaps by a rubber band) along a diagonal on the reverse from the TR of TRUST through the wing and ending at the last A in AMERICA. Additionally, the GO of GOD shows possible issues, too.
     
    Joe2007, medjoy and non_cents like this.
  13. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    That's what I was seeing as well. I was kind of thinking some type of adhesive that was stuck on the coin and removed since the area had a bit of a "rough" look that reminded me of tape.
     
  14. Collector1966

    Collector1966 Senior Member

    Is that corrosion at 9:00 on the rim on the obverse?
     
  15. Joe2007

    Joe2007 Well-Known Member

    I agree with Tom B. I think the corrosion is in the area he noted on the reverse.
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Looks like ordinary toning that has been partially removed by dipping to me.

    As for what Tom sees, I looked at it, but it just looks like contact marks to me, not really corrosion. And the slight discoloration in the area could easily be from more toning that was removed.

    But anything's possible.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page