Interesting Article on the Cutoff of Modern and Classic US Coinage

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by bsowa1029, Mar 25, 2014.

  1. cladking

    cladking Coin Collector


    We just all have distinct perspectives. We collect for different reasons and see the facts in a different light from another angle. Aestetically I don't like dead presidents either. It smacks of a personality cult and it becomes political rather than monetary or artistic. Once you start with politics it becomes difficult to extract politics. No matter how great a politician or a statesman there are some who won't like him and coins will rub his face into them everyday, as it were.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. quarter-back

    quarter-back Active Member

    I share Cladking's enthusiasm for modern clads. In fact, I would take it a bit further. I'd be more excited to get to get a 1972D RDV-008 than I would for most of the classics. I collect many types of coins (classics and moderns), but the 56 - 72 quarter reverse die varieties are where my passion lies and are the first thing I look at. In fact, I forego other coins if I find one in that range that I need. I can get a 1909S VDB any time. That 72D would be a once in a lifetime opportunity.
     
  4. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    Yes. A 1932 Washington is even better at fitting my definition but I'm not saying I collect ALL classic coins. I still dislike the design. I'm a libertarian when it comes to most things - do what you want and have fun. I always feel better around happy people. I just don't like the designs I listed above and the classification system I suggest is a separate topic.
     
  5. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    I consider coins as a "series" and the series, to me, defines what is classic and what is modern. While a 1969-D or 1972-D Type H Reverse Washington are very rare, I never consider them "classic" coins simply because the design is too modern.
     
  6. quarter-back

    quarter-back Active Member

    I must have expressed myself poorly. My comment regarding the type H quarters was more in response to the undercurrent that you (the collective you) collected one or the other. I collect in both arenas. I don't consider a Washington quarter to be a classic either, but I still would take the Type H over many of the classics. Sorry for the poor phrasing.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page