1882-CC and 1902-O Morgan Dollars... Scanned Pictures

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Jan 4, 2014.

  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    So I was the winning bidder on both of these coins, both images were from a scanner. The 1882-CC looks to be a high grade with little to no chatter on the obverse. Same with the 1902-O, both appear to be at least 65's....

    What are your thoughts on these coins?
    cc1.JPG cc2.JPG
    cc1.JPG cc2.JPG 1902-1.JPG 1902-2.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Can't see the 82cc--image is too small and out of focus. 1902 is definitely NOT a 65. 64 at most, and possibly a 63 due to the marks in the field in front of Liberty's face. I'd be generous on it and say 63+ to 64.
     
  4. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Neither appear 65 for me. The CC is, as said, too small to appropriately grade but I would put a nice 63 maybe a 64 on it.

    The O I would go 62.
     
  5. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Too low for the '02. I would say it would grade 63, and looks like a garden variety 63 Morgan. A generous grade would be 63+
     
  6. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I agree , the CC is too blurry and small and the '02-O looks like a 63-64 .
     
  7. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Plus I'd get that '02-O into a new holder fast . I'm surprised the rust hasn't jumped to the coin already .
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  8. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    should have them in hand in 7-10 days, will post new pictures when they come in.
     
  9. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    It has. =/
     

    Attached Files:

  10. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    Acetone help remove that?
     
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    The 1902 looks dead. No luster. Maybe the scan or dipped to death.
     
  12. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Agree with Larry about the 1902.

    Depending on what you paid for the 82-CC, I think you picked up a nice one. I agree the pictures aren't great for grading, but from what you posted, I like it as at least a 64.
     
  13. Ed Sims

    Ed Sims Well-Known Member

    Not only the areas circled by Phoenix21, the rust has also affected the edge of the coin at the three and six o'clock positions. If the seller did not disclose the environmental damage (rust) in the eBay listing you have a case for returning the coin for a full refund which I would recommend. A problem free 1902-O BU Morgan can be easily found at a reasonable price.

    Do NOT remove the coin from the 2x2 it is in if you do decide to return it. Send it back just the way it is.
     
  14. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    So here's the pictures of the 1882-CC GSA

    Now that we have some nice clear pictures and not scans, what do you think?

    822.jpg 8222.jpg 82.jpg
     
    rzage likes this.
  15. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'd say a 63 .
     
  16. Ed Sims

    Ed Sims Well-Known Member

    The 1882 CC looks like a solid MS-63 and could quite possibly net an MS-64 grade. It is a better than average GSA dollar.
     
    rzage likes this.
  17. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    It's a tiny bit better than my GSA '82-CC which I grade 63 , and after a 2nd look the larger pics through me off a little , it could very well get a 64 .
     
  18. bkozak33

    bkozak33 Collector

    Id say a 63 on the cc and the 1902 o would be a ms62
     
  19. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    Really? I was thinking a solid 64 after viewing pics of 64s on eBay.
     
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    It is a solid 63, with a shot at 64. No point in thinking of grading it. Very nice, but average looking for the date.
     
  21. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    1882-CC GSA look better than most 63's I see. I say 63+ or 64.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page