19???

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Ruben1, Dec 22, 2013.

  1. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    Here is something interesting.
    This was pass down through grand parents.
    I know its a wheat penny, what year wheat??? Could it be the 1943 :) wishful thinking.ha-ha.
    Is it worth anything? H-E-L-P
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rdwarrior

    rdwarrior Junior Member

  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    1919 perhaps? It is likely that you'll be able to tell better than anyone here; try examining under different lighting and angles. Unfortunately, you're not looking at a value above common bulk.
     
  5. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    ive tried in different angles and lighting, and its really tough to determine.
    Also tried to compare with all wheaties i have and stll tough to figure out.Doing a little research could it be that 1922 weak penny?I dont know either.
     
  6. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    i agree on 1919
     
  7. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    ill have to study it some more
     
  8. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

  9. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Pretty clear, 1919.
     
  10. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    okay i must settle for 1919. is a penny like this worth anything?
    is it a penny worth authenticating?
     
  11. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    1919 and no it's not worth grading. As for value, I'd pay you 1 shiny new red cent for it :p. When I search rolls a lot of the teens that I find look like yours. That's what comes from almost 100 years of circulation. Still a keeper since it was passed down from your grandparents.
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2013
  12. Evan_76

    Evan_76 New Member

    I see 1919. Is this all wear? A more modern cent that looks like this could be a struck through grease error, or post mint damage acid treatment(cleaning gone wrong)?

    The 1919 cents I have found roll searching usually look a bit more defined than this one.
     
  13. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    After almost 100 years in circulation, you're lucky that's all the wear it has.
     
  14. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    You should see the 1920 I pulled out of a roll last night. It was 10x worse than than this one.
     
  15. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    Ive been told about the grease error, but than again 100 years of circulation who knows.
    This is my first, specially having no trim on it what so ever.
     
  16. Oddnumistics24

    Oddnumistics24 Collector of the odd and wierd

    I have seen this kind of thing before too. Is there not the possibility this could be a foreign planchet? Maybe he should weigh it before it's just dismissed for nothing more than just wear and tear?
     
  17. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    Simply. A common 1919 which would not be the first time someone saved something that has no attributable value.

    Definitely not a 1922 and definitely not a foreign planchet as a foreign planchet would have absolutely no effect of the strike quality.

    This is simply a worn coin whose analysis beyond recognizing it as simply a worn coin will produce nothing more than a 1 hour course in how to waste time.

    No offense to the OP but, its just a worn cent that's barely worth its copper content.
     
  18. Ruben1

    Ruben1 Member

    I have not done that yet. But it would be the best idea. Thanks.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page