which coin looks better?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by Mybadga, Dec 10, 2013.

  1. Mybadga

    Mybadga Member

    Last edited: Dec 10, 2013
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mammoth29

    mammoth29 Well-Known Member

    I would choose 68.
     
  4. Sean the Coin Collector

    Sean the Coin Collector Active Member

    i would also choose the 68 !!
     
  5. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Coin 68 because of the original surface...
     
  6. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    I like the 68 better because of the eye appeal, even though the scratch on the reverse is distracting, the 24 coin has a lot of pitting on both sides and not attractive to me.

    Admittedly, I don't know much about this series.
     
  7. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Id have to go with 68 also even though 24 is a better reverse type.
     
  8. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

  9. jon12

    jon12 Young Numismatic

    I think the 64. I don't like coins that have the look that the 68 has.
     
  10. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Like the color of the heraldic eagle one better the small eagle is a better coin their both beauties in my opinion
     
  11. Mybadga

    Mybadga Member

    Anyone want to take a shot at the grades of both?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    theSharpGun likes this.
  12. theSharpGun

    theSharpGun The King

    #24: VF-35
    #68: EF-40 potentially EF det
    While I really like the design of the top coin I'd have to go with the #68 as well. Must look absolutely gorgeous in hand.
     
  13. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    I like 24. Has a nice smooth look to it.
    The toning on the 68 is WAY too distracting to me, some of the coin's detail is barely noticeable--all I see is blotches.
     
  14. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    +10 ticks perhaps... ;)
     
    theSharpGun likes this.
  15. theSharpGun

    theSharpGun The King

    the reverse tho....
    Honestly the pics make this coin very difficult to grade but I'm sure it's an EF. However, I'll say this, it has a shot at EF-45.
     
  16. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    I find the reverse to be quite stunning, and somewhat agree about the photos, but keep the era/period in-mind and try not to confuse wear with certain "anomalies". Sorry to be vague, but until the OP reveals the grades, I felt it best. With that said, I still think you'll be surprised... or at least one of us will. ;)
     
  17. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    The coin ending in 68 is far higher in grade so this might not be a very fair comparison. It has a mint state, or darned close, obverse and likely a mint state, or darned close, reverse. However, it also has what appear to be adjustment marks on the reverse.
     
  18. theSharpGun

    theSharpGun The King

    Well I'm definitely unfamiliar with these "anomalies". If I'm proven wrong I'd love to learn about them. I honestly haven't graded or even seen enough high-grade coins from this time period so I wouldn't actually be surprised if I'm completely off the mark. In fact I'm hoping I'm wrong now haha
     
  19. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    In the post above (yours) is the answer to what the "anomalies" are. If you're unfamiliar, take a little time and see what is available on online... it is interesting.
     
  20. Mybadga

    Mybadga Member

    Coin 24 was deemed ungradable with VF details. Coin 68 is a MS 65


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  21. 40_mila_kokkina

    40_mila_kokkina Active Member

    What was the reason for the details grade?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page