Alright, so I'm trying to determine if this coin is a F or a VF, the front looks like a nice VF20/30, but the back, according to Photograde could be a low F or maybe even a VG.... What do you think? 1923-S edited - copyright I know the skirt lines in the early years before 1921 was different, but it's still hard to determine the grade by using the pictures in this book. What do you think, fine or very fine?
Comparing the photos provided to PCGS photograde, I agree with the two above me. Might go F15 on a good day.
IMO, the wear is very close to the F12. I could not strongly disagree with F15, but the details are not as strong as the VF20 shown.
Well, here's a VF-20 example that I sold recently (maybe it has less wear, or is it just ANACS overgrading?):
I've seen some pretty crappy '21-21d-21s coins grade vf. maybe they go easier on the early years? the OP coin is a maybe vf, not that I agree but it might grade that.
Trying to grade any coin by comparing it to the photographs of another coin is an effort in futility. This is because you can have a 100 coins all graded the same, and graded correctly, and yet all of them will look slightly different than the others. Grading must be done based on a set of written standards, and each individual coin must be graded based on its own merits or lack thereof. Every coin in any grade is unique.
What I am writing is that the coin shared in the first post is not consistent with how the ANA Grading Guide would grade a VF WLH, is not consistent with how I would grade a VF WLH and is not consistent with my experience in how PCGS would grade a VF WLH. It looks like an F. I'll post a few images later of slightly older WLHs that are already graded by PCGS and that are more in line with how I would grade coins.
Here are three early WLHs where I agree with the grade and they are in the same basic grade range- 1916-S PCGS F15/CAC- I recently sold this coin from my website, so I would not have possession of it if you had any questions about its surfaces or color. 1916-S PCGS VF25/CAC- 1921 PCGS VF25/CAC OGH- Truly, I think this coin is undergraded and would be more accurately portrayed in a VF30 holder.
Only thing I would add is that Walkers dated prior to 1921 are graded on a more lenient set of standards than the rest.
In terms of visible skirt lines that is definitely true, but for overall details of the remainder of the coins I am not so certain there is much difference.
I agree. The skirt lines on Walkers, and the hand of course, are the type of things that should be used for special designations regarding quality of strike. They are much more indicative of a good strike than any of the other things used for special designations on other coins. But Walkers don't even have a special designation. For example, a Jeff can have full steps and still have a terrible strike. The things that were chosen to indicate quality of strike special designations makes no sense.